Coronavirus Is Slowing Courts. But What About the Right to a Speedy Trial?
Federal and state courts in the Nutmeg State announced this week that the jury selection process and jury trials would be delayed until at least April 13 amid fears of the coronavirus. Trials already underway would continue.
March 12, 2020 at 04:56 PM
4 minute read
What is the right balance between public safety and a defendant's right to a fair and speedy trial in a criminal case?
Criminal defense attorneys throughout Connecticut were mulling just that as news emerges that precautions over the spread of the coronavirus have led federal and state courts to stop jury selections and trials until at least April 13.
"The last thing you want is a distracted jury," said William Bloss, of Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder in Bridgeport. "And right now, jurors will be distracted."
Like Bloss, some criminal defense and civil liberties attorneys say the delay is needed. But others question whether it's fair to defendants facing criminal charges.
"It's a very tough call," said East Hartford attorney Larry Adler, whose practice includes civil and criminal litigation. "The problem is you might have someone sitting in jail that cannot afford bond that is presumed innocent. The question is: Can you overcome the public fear by doing some screening of potential jurors, so that you eliminate the concerns and the exposure, so you can allow a trial to go on?"
Adler conceded it's a difficult issue.
"Maybe the judges had a lot more information being given to them then we have about what the medical condition is of Connecticut residents and the jury population," he said.
Criminal defense attorneys Bloss and colleague John Williams said that while it's not an ideal situation, they understand the need to delay jury selection and jury trials to protect the public.
"It's not a great thing to postpone jury trials, but the alternative is worse," Bloss said. "I don't want a criminal defendant of mine being judged by a jury that is worried every time a fellow juror sneezes or coughs."
Related story: You Won't Be Able to Enter CT's Federal Courthouse If You Visited These Places Recently
Nationwide delays
On Wednesday, U.S. District Chief Judge Stefan Underhill of the District of Connecticut issued the order delaying any new jury selection and jury trials for criminal and civil matters in the state's three federal courts until April 13.
Then on Thursday afternoon, word came from the state court's that all superior courts in the state would follow the lead of the federal courts, and also forgo all future jury selection and jury trials until mid-April.
Federal and state courts are set to remain open for other business.
"The interest of public safety outweighs the public interest and defendants' interest," Underhill said in a telephone interview Thursday. "We are worried about jurors in small jury rooms, and it's imperative that we not place jurors in a situation that puts them at risk for health consequences."
Instant Insights / As Coronavirus Spreads, Legal Industry Shifts Into Crisis Management Mode
Connecticut is not the first state to delay jury selections and trials.
For example, at least 24 Texas judges in Harris County who handle civil cases announced they wouldn't hold jury trials in March because of the COVID-19, or coronavirus, outbreak.
And in Georgia, Cobb County superior courts have adopted a more lenient policy allowing jurors who are anxious about possible exposure to coronavirus or who are sick to defer services.
In Connecticut, Dan Barrett, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut, said the group had no position on the matter.
"We are monitoring the situation closely," he said. "We also want to make sure the courts are consistently evaluating its needs to restrict access to the courts."
Meanwhile, longtime New Haven attorney Williams agrees with the court's measures.
"They had absolutely no choice but to delay jury trials," he said. "This is not a joke. People are taking this virus seriously, and they need to take it seriously."
Related stories:
You Won't Be Able to Enter CT's Federal Courthouses If You Visited These Places Recently
Here Are the Latest Updates From Texas Courts Regarding Coronavirus
No More Civil Jury Trials This Month in Harris County Due to Coronavirus
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250