6 Yale Doctors Claim 'Troubling Pattern' of Silencing Sexual Misconduct Complaints
In a broad-ranging action filed in Connecticut federal court Thursday, the female physicians allege that Yale, as an institution, has used a "pattern of deliberate indifference" for many years to effectively silence and blunt the claims of various women who have accused Yale men in power of abuse or harassment.
March 13, 2020 at 11:46 AM
7 minute read
Six female doctors at Yale University have launched a sexual harassment and assault lawsuit against a supervisory Yale professor and anesthesiologist, alleging that for years he groped, forcibly kissed and made other unwanted sexual contact with female physicians while retaliating against those who complained.
In a broad-ranging action filed on Thursday in Connecticut federal court, the female physicians, who were each supervised by defendant Dr. Manuel Lopes Fontes, also name as defendants the university and Yale New Haven Hospital. And they allege sweepingly that Yale, as an institution, has used a "pattern of deliberate indifference" for many years to effectively silence and blunt the claims of various women who have accused Yale men in power of abuse or harassment.
Behind Yale's "veneer of prestige and privilege lies a troubling pattern and history wherein the voices of women … who courageously come forward with complaints of sexual harassment against men in positions of power are suppressed and ignored," the 35-page complaint, written by Manhattan-based law firm Wigdor on behalf of the doctor-plaintiffs, says in its second paragraph.
"Powerful men at Yale University," continues the complaint, "are repeatedly given 'passes' and the 'benefit of the doubt' when the victims of their sexual misconduct come forward, whereas their victims are forced to go through hoops just to obtain a modicum of justice. Through this pattern of deliberate indifference, Yale University intends to send a message that the University will stand not behind those who have been innocently victimized … but behind those who most contribute to the University's prestige and fortune."
The lawsuit, in a section titled "Yale University's Troubling History of Protecting Male Doctors Accused of Sexual Harassment," then outlines several instances of high-ranking male doctors being accused of, or being found to have engaged in, sexual misconduct. And yet, stresses the lawsuit, Yale allegedly still allowed those doctors to stay employed and, in some instances, even subsequently bestowed various university honors on them.
"Moreover," the complaint says while citing a recent Association of American Universities survey, "almost half of all students (49.2%) experienced one or more sexually harassing behaviors, but only 15.6% of people reported these behaviors, which speaks to the lack of efficacy of Yale University's reporting resources."
Still, while Yale and its affiliated hospital are accused of failing to investigate and take corrective action to address sexual misconduct aimed at the female-doctor plaintiffs, it is Fontes, the alleged harasser and abuser, who remains the central figure throughout most of the complaint.
Fontes, through counsel, is denying the allegations.
Three of the five lawsuit causes of action are directed only at him—claims by all six doctors of common-law assault, battery and invasion of privacy. And many of the complaint's pages are filled with sordid tales of Fontes' alleged sexual misconduct against female doctors who served under him inside Yale's Department of Anesthesiology, painting a picture of an esteemed professor who allegedly exhibited often the type of behavior that sparked the #MeToo movement.
In a section focused on Fontes' alleged harassment of plaintiff Dr. Heidi Boules, an attending physician and assistant professor in Yale's anesthesiology department, the lawsuit states that in 2018, Fontes invited Boules a local café supposedly to discuss work.
But once there, he "began to grab Dr. Boules's face and forcibly and unwantedly kiss her on the lips, despite Dr. Boules's objections," leaving her feeling disgusted, the complaint says. Days later, he then allegedly berated Boules in front of colleagues at a staff meeting, before soon directing her to come with him to an elevator.
At the elevator, he "proceeded to once again forcibly and unwantedly kiss Dr. Boules on the lips," the lawsuit says.
In another section the plaintiffs and their Wigdor lawyers who helped to write it, including Michael Willemin and Tanvir Rahman, outline some of the power Fontes allegedly wielded both at Yale and in the profession more widely, noting, for example, that "Dr. Manuel Fontes is a highly decorated and distinguished figure within the medical field, and in particular within the area of anesthesiology."
At Yale, says the complaint, Fontes, who arrived in 2015 after leaving Duke University, holds or has held the positions of professor of anesthesiology, vice chairman of diversity, equity and inclusion, division chief of the Cardiac Anesthesiology Division, and director of clinical research anesthesiology.
In another complaint section, the Wigdor lawyers lay out how in 2019 Fontes allegedly "came up behind" plaintiff Dr. Elizabeth Reinhart, who was a third-year anesthesiology resident, suddenly in a department break room "and began to unwantedly massage her back and shoulders." And that incident, says the complaint, happened just weeks after he had "wrapped his arm around and hugged [Dr. Reinhart] by the waist, and said lewdly, 'I can't wait to see you'" at a New Haven bar called Barcelona later that day. Attending a residency graduation celebration at a lawn club at the time, Reinhart was left feeling "terrified" by the incident, says the complaint.
Fontes is further accused of retaliating professionally against two of the six plaintiffs after they'd gone to Yale higher-ups to complain about his behavior, including one physician, Dr. Ashley Eltorai, who alleges he undercut her internally because she became pregnant.
Other complaint portions are devoted to outlining how some officials at Yale allegedly swept away complaints about Fontes, handing down broad new rules but not disciplining him personally and, in fact, honoring him with new a vice chairman post not long after one complaint came in.
Fontes' lawyer, Robert Mitchell of Mitchell and Sheahan in Stratford, said in an email on Friday that his client "denies each and every allegation of misconduct that these accusers have made."
"Dr. Fontes has been vilified without a fair opportunity to defend himself against what has been a vindictive backroom campaign of scandalous and vicious falsehood, rumor, and innuendo," Mitchell also said, adding that "Dr. Fontes will respond and the truth will shame them as well as those who have prejudged him without affording him even a hint of due process."
He also noted that Fontes' concern at the School of Medicine and at the Yale New Haven Hospital "has always been and remains his patients."
Karen Peart, a Yale spokeswoman, said in an email Thursday that the university "takes charges of sexual harassment seriously." And she noted that "in the summer of 2019, the university was approached by three of the six plaintiffs and took appropriate action" by offering them Yale's support resources for Title IX, a federal law that bans sex-based discrimination at schools that get federal funds, including giving the three women "guidance on filing a complaint with the university."
But "none of the plaintiffs chose to file a formal complaint," said Peart, adding that "Yale has nonetheless been working to resolve the issues raised" and "as in all such cases, Yale is working to ensure that the processes we use to find and act on facts are fair to all involved parties."
A Yale New Haven Hospital spokesman could not be immediately reached for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250