Lawyers Are Working From Home as Coronavirus Spreads—But How's Business?
How's telecommuting affecting the the bottom line?
March 16, 2020 at 08:18 PM
4 minute read
In a new reality tinged with coronavirus, law firms across the country responded by closing offices, and having attorneys and staff work from home to minimize their risk of exposure.
But how's telecommuting affecting the bottom line?
It depends on the firm. Some leaders expect lean ledgers, while others say their business model factors in uncertainty.
"The financials of all of this are unknown," said Stephen Goldman, managing partner at Robinson & Cole, one of the largest law firms in the country, according to its ranking in the Am Law 200. "That's one of the big questions. We just don't know."
Robinson & Cole scaled back operations at two of its 10 offices Monday—in New York City, where it has 47 lawyers and support staff, and its Boston offices with 52 attorneys and staff. Litigators will continue writing briefs and working on discovery, but Goldman said it's too soon to measure the economic impact.
But other lawyers feel confident.
"We are a contingency-fee law firm, and we are used to having cases that go on for years without a fee coming in," said Peter Dreyer, a partner with Stamford's Silver Golub & Teitell. "Right now, in the short-term, we haven't had to plan, or thought about planning, with regard to finances."
Silver Golub handles personal injury, medical malpractice and products liability litigation. It employs 18 attorneys with a total staff of 38, but announced Monday that its Stamford office would have a skeleton staff of about five people, including one attorney at all times. It closed the firm to outside visitors, banned in-person meetings in the office, and canceled all depositions this week, unless its lawyers can take part via video conference.
Dreyer said the firm will evaluate each week whether to return to the office.
"As things get pushed back and canceled, we will analyze the finances then," he said. "If it goes a few weeks to a few months, it will probably not affect us. If it goes longer, it will affect everyone."
Special Report / As Coronavirus Spreads, Legal Industry Shifts into Crisis Management Mode
In Coral Gables, Florida, attorney Jacqueline Calderin, founding and managing partner of Agentis Law, said her nine-lawyer firm has a major advantage as its employees prepared to work from home, beginning Monday. First, Agentis' key practice area is one that some economists predict will rise in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak.
"We expect a ton of bankruptcy work," Calderin said. "We have seen some filings, and expect a flurry of small-business filings because of the climate we are in now."
Second, the attorney said the firm put important protocols in place after a prior disaster, Hurricane Irma, which wreaked havoc in South Florida in September 2017.
"We learned from that hurricane that we were having a lot of trouble being connected to laptops," Calderin said. "We just did not have a robust way of connecting remotely to the network. Since the hurricane, we have upgraded our service. It was a big capital expenditure in service and technology."
The two factors have combined to reassure Calderin of Agentis' prospects. The firm will continue to pay its 19 employees full pay and benefits during the duration of its work-from-home period, and Calderin said morale was high.
"We are actually extending an offer now to a new associate," the attorney said Monday. "We expect to stay busy, as our firm handles more and more bankruptcy cases in the fallout from the virus."
Meanwhile attorneys at Billings, Barrett & Bowman prioritized reaching out to clients. They anticipate no business slowdown as the firm's employees telecommute.
"Our clients do want to see us," partner Peter Bowman said. "I think they all understand that this is a very significant public health issue, and we want to be responsible to the community."
Related stories:
Employers Are in a Dicey Situation as Coronavirus Spreads. Here's What Lawyers Suggest
Big Law Goes Remote: Updates on Law Firm Closures During the Coronavirus Crisis
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC is Over'
- 2NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 3A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 4Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 5State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250