Here are the Latest Updates on Connecticut Courts' Responses to Coronavirus
The Connecticut courts have announced delays of jury selection and jury trials and federal courts have barred entry to individuals who have been in certain countries and communities during the past two weeks.
March 17, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Most Connecticut courts are staying open despite concerns about the spread of COVID-19 globally. But they have delayed jury selections and trials, and are urging people to conduct court-related business via phone.
The Connecticut Superior Court, Connecticut Appellate Court and the state's three federal courts have all announced coronavirus-related contingency plans.
But as of Tuesday afternoon, the Connecticut Supreme Court was still planning to hear oral arguments for its seventh session, which runs from March 24 through April 2.
The state's law libraries also announced Monday they'd be closed until further notice.
Connecticut Superior Courts
The Connecticut superior courts have delayed all future jury selections and trials through at least April 13. Juries sitting before the March 13 directive would continue those trials.
While all courts are open, the judicial branch announced that from March 16 through March 27 it would schedule and hear only matters identified as "priority 1 business functions." That includes criminal arraignments of defendants held in lieu of bond, all arraignments involving domestic violence cases, juvenile detention hearings, civil protection orders, termination of parental rights, and family orders of relief from abuse, among others.
Hartford Superior Court Administrative Judge David Sheridan issued his own directive on March 11.
That directive states that beginning March 13 and until further notice, all pretrial conferences, status conferences and trial management conferences would be conducted over the phone. He also said requests for continuance for up to three months—that are based on legitimate concerns over exposure to the virus—would be "automatically granted."
Appellate court
The Connecticut Appellate Court in Hartford announced Tuesday morning that oral arguments would not go forward in any of the cases scheduled to be heard from Tuesday through Thursday, which is the end of the sixth term. As of Tuesday, cases have not been scheduled for the court's seventh term, which starts April 6.
Connecticut federal courts
Like the state courts, the state's three federal courts in Bridgeport, Hartford and New Haven will also stop all new jury selections and jury trials until at least April 13. Trials already underway are set to continue.
In addition, unlike in the Superior Court system, Chief Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Stefan Underhill issued a March 11 order barring entry of individuals who visited China, South Korea, Japan, Italy, Iran, New York's New Rochelle community, and any other location that has been under coronavirus-related quarantine in the past 14 days.
Related stories:
Justice Delayed? Lawyers Brace for Impact of 3-Month Continuances Amid Coronavirus Precautions
Coronavirus Is Slowing Courts. But What About the Right to a Speedy Trial?
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Settlements of 2024
- 2Black, Hispanic Law Student Enrollment Falls at Top 14 Following End of Affirmative Action, but Mostly Improved at California's Top Schools
- 3Justices Wade Into South Carolina's Medicaid Fight With Planned Parenthood
- 4Fisher & Phillips Elects 25 New Partners In 15 Cities
- 5New York State Bar Outlines 2025 Legislative Priorities, Aiming for Fairness, Equity
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250