Learn How This Connecticut Lawyer Swayed a Superior Court Jury
A Meriden attorney said his strategy of keeping "it simple" for a jury in a motor vehicle tort enabled him to convince that jury to clinch a six-figure judgment.
March 18, 2020 at 03:21 PM
3 minute read
Keep it simple.
That was the strategy plaintiffs attorney Ramiro Alcazar used when he saw defense counsel attempting to show a Meriden Superior Court jury that plaintiff Ricardo Silva's injuries weren't due to a 2012 car accident, but rather resulted from two other car accidents and two workers' compensation-related claims.
The plaintiff's side hired a chiropractor, who testified at trial that Silva's back injuries were from the 2012 car crash at the center of the suit, and not subsequent incidents. And Alcazar claims his team kept things simple, while defense counsel, Hartford solo practitioner William Melley III, tried to overwhelm the jury.
"Mr. Melley questioned whether future treatment was related to this accident. He questioned the chiropractor. He questioned the MRI, and he questioned the herniated disc," Alcazar said Wednesday. "All I did was make it simple: I told them that I'm a lawyer and not a doctor. I played the lawyer and opposing counsel played the doctor. I think that and the comparison between the plaintiff and the defendant sold the jury.
"I told the jury that there was a 47-year age gap between my client, who was 32, and the defendant, Harry Vega," said Alcazar, a Meriden solo practitioner. "My client, though, looked older. I told the jury to look at both of these individuals and I told them to imagine how my client, who was walking with a cane and was in pain, would look at Mr. Vega's age. I think the jury liked that."
Alcazar continued: "I kept it simple and focused for the jury. I've seen too many lawyers make it all confusing for a jury by throwing everything at them at once."
After deliberating for four hours, the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff for $121,769 on March 11. Melley did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday. It's not clear if he will raise a challenge before the Connecticut Appellate Court.
According to Alcazar and the complaint, which was filed in January 2013 in Meriden Superior Court, Vega's pickup truck ran a stop sign on Center Street in Meriden and struck Silva's 2007 Chevrolet. Vega, a retired Meriden police officer, was issued a police infraction for failure to yield the right of way.
Alcazar said his client, who suffered severe back pain and a herniated disc, told the jury that the car accident "ruined my life."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
- 2Insurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
- 3Supply Chain Challenges and Opportunities Under the Second Trump Administration
- 4As Atlanta Partners Moved to Am Law 200 Firms at a Higher Rate in 2024, 2 New Arrivals Benefited
- 5A Tech-Enabled Approach to Professional Development Is the Path Forward for Young Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250