Time Ran Out: Judge Dismisses Case Alleging Sex Assault Decades Earlier
Citing the statute of limitation for when a victim of sex assault can file a lawsuit, a federal judge Monday granted a motion for summary judgment on behalf of the prestigious Indian Mountain School.
March 18, 2020 at 01:34 PM
5 minute read
With a slew of Connecticut boarding schools being sued for sexual abuse dating back decades, the statute of limitations is taking center stage.
The lawsuits hint at varying litigation strategies for plaintiffs working against statutory deadlines.
One of those schools got word Monday that a lawsuit alleging a former Indian Mountain School English teacher sexually abused a boy decades ago was dismissed.
While U.S. District Judge Janet Bond Arterton of the District of Connecticut's ruling—in all likelihood—closed the books on a lawsuit filed on behalf of former Indian Mountain School student Ramsay Gourd, an attorney in an unrelated case is using a different strategy as he also went up against statute of limitations rules in a decades-old sex abuse case.
In February, plaintiffs counsel Ryan McGuigan, principal of Hartford-based Rome McGuigan, was faced with presenting oral arguments to the Connecticut Supreme Court in a matter that involved several consolidated lawsuits filed on behalf of patients of a pediatrician accused of sex abuse. The doctor has since died. In that case, the victims are all now in their 40s and have several more years in which they could bring suit. But, McGuigan, citing "strategy," said he'd make the case to the justices in focusing on negligence claims—not the sex abuse claims— which has a three-year window under state law.
McGuigan maintained the negligence and sexual abuse claims were intertwined, and, therefore, the three-year statute of limitations for negligence claims shouldn't apply. It's not clear if McGuigan's strategy will prevail as the justices on the state's high court have yet to rule on the case.
While the Gourd case did include claims of negligence and infliction of emotional distress, the strategy McGuigan focused on was to made the negligence claims first and foremost and forego the sex abuse arguments.
In her 19-page ruling in the Gourd case, Arterton said the action wasn't timely since the statute of limitation had run out.
The ruling from the federal judge could have an impact on attorneys down the road who decide to pursue similar cases where the statute of limitations plays a factor.
Gourd, a former student of the pre-K through grade 9 private boarding school, joined many other students over the years who claimed now deceased teacher Christopher Simonds sexually assaulted them. Gourd claims he was sexually assaulted when he was a student from 1977-1980.
Gourd filed his lawsuit against the school in 2018. At the time, Gourd was 53 years old even though he was required to file suit up to his 48th birthday. Today, victims can file suit up to their 51st birthday. In Gourd's suit, plaintiffs counsel argued the statute of limitations should be removed under the doctrine of fraudulent concealment. Fraudulent concealment occurs when a party conceals or intentionally suppresses material information.
Gourd's counsel, Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder attorney Antonio Ponvert III, maintains in court papers his client didn't know until after the statute of limitations expired that the school allegedly knew that Simonds was a pedophile, had abused other children and did nothing about it.
Ponvert declined to comment for this story.
But, Ponvert's arguments did not sway Arterton, who wrote, "There is no genuine issue of material fact that plaintiff timely knew that he had a potential cause of action against defendant. Because it is undisputed that plaintiff was aware that he had a potential cause of action against defendant, plaintiff cannot, as a matter of law, rely on the fraudulent concealment doctrine to toll the timing of his claims."
The judge also wrote that there was sufficient information in the public realm including via media reports and other lawsuits that the school should have known that the teacher had the propensity to abuse young students before 2013, the timeframe of when Gourd was supposed to have filed suit.
Simonds has been accused of sexually assaulting several boys in the private boarding school in Lakeville. The school reached confidential settlements with two alleged victims in January 2018.
The Gourd lawsuit alleges that he and other students were known as Simonds' "boys" or "pets" and that Simonds gave them marijuana, cigarettes, alcohol, LSD and cocaine. Simonds also allegedly showed Gourd and other boys pornography and took photos of them to blackmail them into silence. The lawsuit sought, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages against the school.
The judge's ruling this week comes on the heels of numerous similar lawsuits against private boarding schools in the state. They include a suit against The Westover School alleging a teacher sexually abused a student there in 2006 and 2007; The Hotchkiss School, where several boys alleged a teacher abused them in the 1990s; and the Kent School, where a female student alleged a French teacher repeatedly sexually assaulted her in the 1980s.
Representing Indian Mountain are Robinson & Cole Hartford attorneys Bradford Babbitt, Kathleen Dion and Jeffrey White. None of the attorneys responded to a request for comment Tuesday.
Ally Morrissey is the school's director of communications. Due to concerns over the coronavirus, the school is closed. Morrissey could not be reached for comment.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250