Teaching in the Time of Cholera: I Caught the COVID-19 Virus
As I write this, I am in isolation at the UConn Medical Center in Farmington, having passed (failed?) two COVID-19 tests.
March 31, 2020 at 10:18 AM
4 minute read
The title of Gabriel Garcia Marquez's 1985 novel "Love in the Time of Cholera" plays off the Spanish word "colera," which can mean both passion and disease. I was thinking that it's not a bad theme for where I find myself as I end my teaching career in this time of panic and pandemic.
As I write this, I am in isolation at the UConn Medical Center in Farmington, having passed (failed?) two COVID-19 tests. I'm part of the experimental program using antimalarial drugs; the stuff seems to be working. My fever, virus loads and other markers are all improving. If this disease is part of "Boomer Removal," this old boomer ain't ready to go just yet.
It's funny, but my teaching career is bookended by catastrophe and panic. I began teaching at UConn Law in September 2001. A few weeks later the Twin Towers fell. I told my students that life as we knew it would never be the same. It took some time, but I think the prediction proved accurate.
A few weeks ago, as we prepared to decamp for spring break, to be followed by life in the ether classroom, I told my class the same thing. While they initially thought I was being dramatic, turns out I was righter than most would have guessed.
I have tried several grievance matters recently with witnesses appearing via videoconference from remote locations, and just presented at a virtual seminar using the same platform. The technology is not great yet, but it sure beats shuffling through a crowded courthouse, breathing my neighbor's germs. My guess is that after a bit of grousing and moaning about all we have lost by converting from in-person to virtual, this will be more the norm than the exception.
Some students have complained that they miss the frisson of traditional classroom interaction and hope we'll get back to the old model sooner rather than later. I've heard the same complaints from colleagues about having witnesses testify remotely instead of live in the courtroom. To both I warn, don't hold your breath. This is the new reality.
I do have to admit that it is a lot harder to cross-examine someone on a screen; you can't see those important "tells," such as a bit of perspiration on their upper lip or the subtle squirm as they tighten up when you approach a sensitive issue, but the savings in time and effort, not to mention the public health issues, may mean that this will be more the norm than the exception from now on. When students grouse, my response is that learning to navigate the world of a virtual law school is probably pretty good training for the practice of law in the next century.
Every generation has its inflection points, after which things never really are the same. For my parents, it was the Depression, followed by Pearl Harbor. For me, it was the assassinations (of both Kennedys and King), followed by 9/11. COVID-19 may be the final act in my play. Regardless of whether it turns out to be as bad as the Spanish (or swine) flu, or passes quickly into the annals of public health history, it reveals just how small the world has become. Within a few weeks of the first emergence of a new respiratory disease in a province in China few of us have ever heard of, the thing spreads worldwide, like the proverbial drop of ink in the pitcher of water, before anyone can mount any real response.
With all due respect to my friends who think we can harden borders and build walls to keep out the bad things in the rest of the world, I'm afraid that isolation is not the answer. My young charges, who will finish their semester learning on a screen, practicing oral advocacy in a virtual courtroom, writing a brief collaboratively with their partner via a shared document platform and e-filing the finished product, will be better equipped to handle the practice of law in the next decades than me and my colleagues who learned all of this in an analog world. While the medium will be different, the underlying ideals of searching for truth, finding and applying the law, serving clients and doing justice will continue.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250