A Gathering Storm Threatens the Future of Legal Aid
As funding dries up, a flood of legal needs is beginning to build, and it will soon spill over into Connecticut courts.
April 01, 2020 at 11:24 AM
5 minute read
As COVID-19 patients begin to fill the beds of hospitals, Connecticut's courts—like most professions in the state—have gone silent. But a legal storm is brewing in the distance that has the potential to devastate the legal aid community and the low-income clients they serve. The impending disaster threatens funding for legal aid just as cases are poised to spike. As the private bar mobilizes to lend a hand during this medical emergency, there are steps private attorneys can take now to avoid legal calamity for Connecticut's most vulnerable citizens.
The first threat to Connecticut's legal aid programs comes in the form of funding. The vast majority of legal aid funding in the state flows through the Connecticut Bar Foundation. The CBF provides funding through three different mechanisms—funds from interest on lawyer's trust (IOLTA) accounts, funds generated from court fees and funds granted through the judicial branch. While the judicial branch grants remain unchanged, IOLTA revenues will decline significantly because bank interest rates have plunged to a fraction of what they were last year. The unprecedented court closure may also result in a significant drop to court-fee revenues, the largest source of legal aid funding in Connecticut. These funding decreases would hit the legal aid community starting in May and could continue until the courts return to their regular operations.
Other funders are re-assessing their priorities and considering orienting their grants away from legal aid, toward medical assistance. Meanwhile, social distancing has wreaked havoc on event-fundraising. With no understanding of when the limits on public gathering will lift, spring and summer fundraisers must be postponed at best. The Connecticut Veterans Legal Center (CVLC), for example, holds an annual bike ride fundraiser each June. However, since the onset of COVID-19, our host has had to cancel the event and cannot commit to a new date. While we are adapting to an all-virtual ride, designed to build solidarity and build awareness about the plight of homeless and mentally ill veterans, our last sponsorship commitment came in on March 3rd and we remain at less than half the committed sponsors we had last year. The situation is similar for other organizations.
Even as funding dries up, a flood of legal needs is beginning to build; it will soon spill over into Connecticut courts. To aid in social distancing, the judicial branch has postponed evictions until May. While it may extend the moratorium again, when it lifts, there will be a rush of individuals in need of legal assistance. Not only will the courts face months of suspended housing cases that were the normal products of an ordinary, growing economy; they will also have to grapple with the fallout from the economic downturn. We have already seen unprecedented unemployment. As the economy moves into the expected post-COVID recession, more residents will lose their jobs and the numbers facing eviction will grow. Many legal aid clients do not have access to the internet and often have phone service that runs out of minutes. Under COVID restrictions, they will likely struggle to reach service providers. When the restrictions lift, the need for aid will be high.
Right now, private attorneys are volunteering to be of assistance and are eager to help fellow citizens in need. Firms like McCarter and English and Halloran Sage have reached out to CVLC to lend assistance. While housing cases are on hold, VA benefits and other administrative cases are still proceeding. For attorneys trained to practice VA benefits law, this the perfect opportunity to help low-income veterans in need. At a time when the economy is crashing and access to a doctor is even more of a life and death issue than usual, these cases provide clients with the potential to access both income and healthcare.
But the bigger storm still lies ahead and legal aid programs will need additional hands to handle the influx of cases. When the state courts reopen, there will be a rush of need for legal assistance, particularly in housing session. Private firms can stand in solidarity with the state's most vulnerable residents by suggesting attorneys volunteer their time to handle the barrage of cases and by allowing associates to count the hours they spend on pro bono matters toward their billable goals. Halloran Sage, which was recognized by the Hartford County Bar Association for outstanding work representing indigent clients in housing cases, already does this. Others should follow suit.
Finally, the private bar can show up for the state's most vulnerable residents by financially supporting the legal aid community. We need both your time and funding. Our legal aid organizations have to be able to screen and intake clients, prepare cases to transfer to a pro bono, and track and report on each pro bono case. One way to support the legal aid community is to support our reconfigured, virtual events. CVLC invites all law firms to support veterans recovering from homelessness and mental illness by signing up for the virtual Ride for Our Vets as sponsors and by creating virtual teams who raise funds. During this time of isolation, it can be a great team-building activity to form a team and train simultaneously—but independently—and sharing your support virtually with each other. While we cannot all physically be together, we can achieve that social connection that many of us crave and join forces for good.
The virus spreading across the country is impacting us all in new and unforeseen ways. Its biggest effects on the legal system still lie ahead. The challenge will be great. But, with a coordinated effort between legal service providers and the private bar, we can rise to meet it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250