Best Practices: 5 Tips From Judges, Lawyers on Using Zoom
Judges and attorneys give their pointers on how best to use Zoom technology.
April 07, 2020 at 01:13 PM
4 minute read
COVID-19 has forced attorneys and judges from across the country to use videoconferences—many for the first time.
Use these guidelines from judges and attorneys to make the most of Zoom, a popular platform for court hearings, mediations and arbitrations.
|1. Factor in savings
Silver Golub & Teitell partner Marco Allocca said Zoom technology can help litigators cut costs.
"Zoom allows our firm's 19 attorneys to continue to work," Allocca said. "For one thing, it saves on expenses to go to and from court. If there is a mediator with a good reputation, no one wants to travel or have the judge travel. With Zoom, there are other options."
|2. Check what's visible on your screen
"The best way to mimic an in-person meeting is to recreate that experience by sharing documents," Allocca said.
That means Zoom users should be prepared to share their computer screens with others in the conference, he said.
And that means taking precautions to control what attendees see.
"Lawyers were concerned about keeping their communication with their clients confidential," said Texas Judge Roy Ferguson. "We made sure that the Zoom settings were fixed in a way that protected the client's confidentiality."
Ferguson presides over Texas' 394th Judicial District, which covers five counties. He said judges have used Zoom technology for more than 2,000 court hearings in the state since March 8, and that he's taken part in about 20 of them.
|3. Test every device
Ferguson advises attorneys to work with clients and witnesses in advance of Zoom sessions, so that all parties can log in successfully and understand the court protocol for testifying.
The judge said Zoom users need to practice logging in to the hearing from the device they will use.
"We've had people who have practiced logging in, and they then go to their tablet or phone and realize the camera just doesn't work," he said.
|4. Avoid the device's microphone
Allocca said headsets with built-in microphones and headphones work best, because they pick up the speaker's voice, while limiting other sounds in the room.
"If you use the computer microphone that is built in, you will hear background noise," he said. "And the quality isn't as good."
Cooney, Scully & Dowling Attorneys at Law partner Herb Shepardson agrees.
"Many Zoom users, I am noticing, make mistakes such as with the mute button," he said. "Use the mute button when not asking questions, and refrain from making background noise, as that can create short-term technical problems."
|5. Offer practice sessions
Former judge and Pullman & Comley member Robert Holzberg, who has overseen at least two Zoom mediations in the past week, said the feedback he's heard from peers is positive. Once the glitches and kinks are removed, videoconference platforms offer valuable tools to judges and attorneys.
Holzberg creates a backup plan, in case the technology fails or one of the participants is unable to navigate the software.
'We always send out conference call numbers with our Zoom invitations," he said. "We also offer practice sessions on Zoom before mediation. … Preparation is vital."
Related stories
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
- 2Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
- 3Judge Rises to Tifton Superior Court Bench
- 4'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
- 5New Teeth for Anti-SLAPP Statute? Absolute Immunity for Union Grievance Proceedings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250