How Meteorologist Helped Cheshire Lawyers Secure $95,000 Settlement
Up against the state's "Ongoing Storm Doctrine," which holds that parties can't bring slip-and-fall claims during snowstorms except for a few exceptions, plaintiffs attorney Peter Bowman went looking for one of those exceptions with the help of a meteorologist.
April 10, 2020 at 12:27 PM
3 minute read
It's all about the timing.
Up against the state's "Ongoing Storm Doctrine," which holds that parties can't bring slip-and-fall claims during snowstorms except for a few exceptions, plaintiffs attorney Peter Bowman went looking for one of those exceptions with the help of state meteorologist Bob Cox.
And he found it, helping to clinch a $95,000 settlement on March 18 with the help of attorney-colleague Erandi Reiland.
There had been a snowstorm, but it had happened long before his client's tumble, argued Bowman, a partner with Cheshire-based Billings, Barrett & Bowman. He said the meteorologist "gave us the timing of the storm."
"There was no precipitation for at least 13 hours before my client fell," he said. "And so we felt that was sufficient to overcome the state's Ongoing Storm Doctrine."
Bowman argued that the owners of a restaurant parking lot where plaintiff Jeanne Kehoe fell on black ice had enough time to clear away the snow and ice.
The defendants were the restaurant and its owners, Helmer Wolf and Arturo Guerra. Their counsel were Simsbury-based Litchfield Cavo attorneys Richard Lord Jr. and Jacqueline Maulucci. Neither attorney responded to a request for comment Friday.
But in court pleadings, the defense argued comparative negligence, claiming Kehoe "failed to be watchful of her surroundings and general conditions."
Kehoe fell in the parking lot of the South Windsor restaurant The Mill on the River in December 2016. The 63-year-old Cigna analyst and East Hartford resident fell and landed on her left wrist and side, her attorney said. She underwent left-wrist surgery five days after the fall.
"Overnight, that snow turned into ice and we had classic black ice," Bowman said. "The holidays are a busy time of the year for that restaurant, and management relied on employees to park in the lot and report on any ice. They didn't have a company or contractor monitoring it for them."
According to the September 2018 lawsuit filed in Hartford Superior Court, the defendant restaurant allegedly "allowed its agents, contractors, servants and/or employees to leave snow piles on the sidewalk and parking lot that, when melting, would result in water run off into the parking lot which would refreeze, creating hazardous conditions for pedestrians."
The case settled after a four-hour session with mediator Herbert Shepardson, of Hartford-based Cooney, Scully and Dowling.
Bowman said his initial demand was for $236,000, while the defense's first offer was $25,000.
"Given the issues regarding comparative negligence, we believe the $95,000 was a fair amount," Bowman said, adding the case would likely have presented an obstacle for attorneys in Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Maine, where snowstorms are common. "A slip-and-fall in New England is a very challenging case, as New Englanders are used to walking on snow and ice. Juries sometimes are skeptical of those claims."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readAttorney Overcomes Low Medical Bills, Captures $1 Million Policy Limit
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1As AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
- 2Texas Lawyer, Client Sued for $10 Million Over Bitcoin Mining Deal
- 3Final Misconduct Hearing Date Impending for Fulton Judge
- 4Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
- 5How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250