Connecticut Federal Courts Gearing to Reopen in May
Court officials had initially pushed back jury selection and jury trials in the state's federal courthouses to May 15, but that's likely still too early.
April 14, 2020 at 06:18 PM
3 minute read
U.S. District Judge Stefan R. Underhill for the District of Connecticut. Courtesy photo
Federal courts in Connecticut could be back in operation for some matters soon after May 15, but they'll require more time before jury trials resume, U.S. District Chief Judge Stefan Underhill of the District of Connecticut said.
Court officials had initially pushed back jury selection and jury trials in the state's federal courthouses in Bridgeport, New Haven and Hartford to May 15, but that's likely still too early.
"We are taking a step-by-step approach, and will slowly be getting back to normal," Underhill said Tuesday. "Civil matters involving just lawyers will most likely proceed first. … Theoretically, it could happen soon after May 15. But even with that date, we have to listen to the health experts, and see where we stand."
Federal courts are using telephone and video, but might soon have in-person proceedings for civil litigation matters involving few people.
"We do not want lawyers to go to court if they might be exposing staff to COVID-19, or vice versa," Underhill said.
Underhill said he'd assess the situation in about one month. Meanwhile, the three federal courthouses remain open with a skeleton staff. Most court users utilize e-filing, but people without a computer can go to a federal courthouse "and file physically with a clerk at the front door," he said.
With regard to the state's Superior Court system, Chief Court Administrator Patrick Carroll III issued a statement Tuesday saying "our goal is to incrementally increase the volume of court work that can be handled by judges and court staff."
As it relates to family matters, Carroll said, "we have identified two areas that may be addressed remotely. They are the approval of joint petitions for nonadversarial divorce; and entering court orders regarding requests for approval of temporary agreements, without a court appearance."
As of 7 p.m. Monday, Connecticut had recorded 13,381 cases of the coronavirus and 602 deaths from the virus, according to the office of Gov. Ned Lamont.
Related stories:
These 3 Connecticut Courts Just Closed Their Doors
As Concerns Over COVID-19 Grow, Connecticut Closes More Courts
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
3 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madicon, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
