Bar Examining Committee Considering Changing Rules for Law Students Amid COVID-19
The Connecticut Bar Examining Committee is expected to propose changes to the Connecticut Practice Book to allow law school students in the state to work with a supervising attorney and to allow for limited court exposure before taking the bar examination.
April 23, 2020 at 02:50 PM
4 minute read
If the Connecticut Bar Examining Committee gets its way, graduating law students in Connecticut will be allowed to represent clients in clinics under the guidance of a licensed attorney until those students have a chance to take the bar examination, which has been pushed back from late July due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Anne Dranginis, a Pullman & Comley member and chairwoman of the Connecticut Bar Examining Committee, said the full committee will meet Friday and is expected to suggest amending the Connecticut Practice Book to allow law students to work with a supervising attorney and "have some autonomy in the process."
The Bar Examining Committee is expected to recommend to the Rules Committee of the Superior Court that the practice book be amended. The Rules Committee would have the final say on the matter.
"I'd hope they would sign off on it," Dranginis said.
Amending the practice book in such a fashion—something other states are also considering—would "allow law students to get their feet wet," Dranginis said. "It's all to benefit law school graduates who have been delayed in taking the bar examination. It might be useful to a firm that might hire them and the amending of the practice book allows the student to go into court alone on a limited basis."
As it stands now, Dranginis said, the bar examinations in Connecticut have been pushed back from this summer to Sept. 30 and Oct. 1 at the Hartford Convention Center. The dates are dependent on the status of the COVID-19 situation at the time, Dranginis said.
Law school officials and administrators said students have been anxious about the delay in taking the bar examination and said faculty is doing everything to ease those concerns.
"It's hard on our students in many ways and not knowing when the bar exam will be taken is among them," said Brad Saxton, interim dean at Quinnipiac University School of Law. "It's hard not knowing when the exam is because it affects when you start studying. You have to plan that out and do more extensive studying right before the test is taken."
Saxton continued: "We are very aware of how stressful and difficult this time is for them and are listening to the requests from our students."
One request that was granted as of April 2, Saxton said, was to move from the normal letter grading to a pass/fail grading for law school students.
"These are unusual circumstances. Our students can't go to study room and the law library and by going to a pass/fail grading system, it takes some of the pressure off of them," Saxton said. "Many of our students say the pass/fail grading system is more helpful and they don't have to worry about the anxieties associated with wondering what their letter grade will be."
The difference between 2019 and 2020 in the tumultuous times that are the COVID-19 world is like day and night, said Suzanne Hard, director of the Center for Career Development at the University of Connecticut School of Law.
"The hardest part for our students and for all of us is the uncertainty," Hard said. "I tell our students to focus on things they can actually control like their mental health and well-being and to be the best remote law school student they can be."
Hard said about 145 University of Connecticut School of Law students are expected to take the bar examination, while Saxton said about 80 of his students are expected to take the test.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250