Most Law Students Failed in Connecticut, With Only 34% Passing Bar Exam in February
The pass rate among those taking the February bar exam continues to go down. Thirty-four percent of candidates taking the Connecticut test in February 2020 passed.
April 27, 2020 at 06:01 PM
4 minute read
For the third consecutive year, the percentage of law students passing the February Connecticut bar exam dropped below 50%—to a two-decade low of 34%—the latest sign of a downward trend both statewide and nationally.
The national average score on the Multistate Bar Exam fell 1.4 points from the previous year to 132.6, Connecticut Law Tribune affiliate Law.com reported, citing the National Conference of Bar Examiners, which develops the 200-question, multiple-choice portion of the test for candidates across the country.
In Connecticut, the February pass/fail numbers continued to drop.
In 2016, 63% of candidates in the state passed. That number fell to 50% in 2017, and 38% in 2018. There was a slight uptick to 40% in 2019; but then it fell to 34% this year.
|
Here's the list of higher learning institutions that were represented in the February 2020 Bar Examination in Connecticut:
|
See the pass/fail rate for the February 2020 Bar Examination in Connecticut:
The February numbers, released Friday, shows that 46 of 137 test-takers passed.
Only three institutions had double-digits pass rates for test-takers: the University of Connecticut School of Law, Quinnipiac University School of Law and Western New England Law School in Massachusetts.
The pass rate for the University of Connecticut School of Law jumped from 40% in February 2019 to 56%, as 14 of the 25 students who took the test passed in February 2020.
The pass rate for Quinnipiac University School of Law jumped from 31% in February 2019 to 41% in 2020, as 12 of the 29 candidates passed.
Western New England Law School did not fare well, as 41% passed in February 2019, but just 11% in 2020, when two of 19 students who took the test passed.
Connecticut Bar Examining Chairwoman Anne Dranginis, a Pullman & Comley member, is optimistic for next year.
"I think the low pass rate is due to a multitude of factors, some of them economic and some of them systematic," Dranginis said. "This may be an anomaly, but we will have to wait and see. I am hopeful the numbers will go up next year as there are a lot of motivated young people in law school now."
University of Connecticut School of Law dean Tim Fisher said he was "satisfied with our numbers, but we can always do better."
"The February pass rates are lower than the July sittings everywhere around the country," Fisher said Monday. "February is often seen as having lower pass rates because many test-takers have children and/or day jobs or family obligations. Whereas, with the traditional exam in July people allow for weeks of intense preparation after graduation."
Fisher said the number he looks at are first-time test-takers, which has always hovered in February for the law school at about 75%. In February, six of eight test-takers—or 75%—for the university took the exam for the first time and passed.
"It's a small sample size," Fisher said of first-time test-takers, but, he said, "those numbers tell me the most on how well we are preparing our graduates."
Fisher said his university has implemented several initiatives in recent years to help law students on their bar exam. They include. Fisher said, two courses that were rolled out in 2019. One is a bar preparation course, which focuses on the methodology of taking the bar exam. The second, he said, is a commercial bar prep course, which teaches the subject matter of the exams.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Wrongful-Death Case Against Adult Day Care Sparks Call for State Regulation
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250