Insurer Allegedly Tried to Leverage COVID-19 Court Closures, But This Lawyer Had Trump Card
Glastonbury-based plaintiffs attorney Andrew Garza helped secure a $100,000 settlement for a client who suffered a torn rotator cuff following a Norwich car accident two years ago.
April 30, 2020 at 01:57 PM
4 minute read
An insurance company allegedly told plaintiffs counsel Andrew Garza that he would be wise to settle a car-crash claim for $50,000, because the courts were closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the case might not be heard for years.
But Garza said he decided to play hardball.
If litigants would invoke the pandemic, then he would mention his client's wife—a nurse, working on the front line of efforts to combat the coronavirus.
"They did try to leverage the COVID-19 court closures and they said essentially, 'Who knows when the courts will be opened?'" he said. "They tried to use that as a strategy. They were stalling."
Garza, co-owner of Glastonbury-based Connecticut Trial Firm, alleged insurer ProSight Specialty Insurance "knows that lawyers today feel financial pressures to take settlements because of COVID-19 and the court closures."
"They tried to use that to their advantage," he said.
Edwin Cotton, claims director for ProSight Specialty, handled the case. He did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.
Garza's client never filed suit, but his complaint would have targeted ProSight's client, Norwich Taxi LLC, which employed the other driver involved in the crash. No one at the taxi company responded to a request for comment.
Policy limit
Garza's client, Ryan Geist, suffered a rotator cuff tear and needed surgery following the rear-end collision with driver Joseph DiFrancesca in Norwich in June 2018.
Garza thought the case was worth at least the $100,000 limit on the car DiFrancesca drove.
Garza said he also had an ace in the hole: Geist's nurse practitioner wife.
"I told them they'd have to explain to a jury down the road why you did not pay the $100,000 to this man while his wife was out there supporting the community and fighting COVID-19," Garza said Thursday."What would a jury say about that?"
Garza said the carrier agreed to pay soon before he was to file a lawsuit because "they knew we were right. Our medical evidence was clear and his injuries were significant."
"We told them they had a week to pay the $100,000 policy or we were going to file a lawsuit," Garza said.
Garza said the case was settled April 7 and the money was disbursed to the 29-year-old Geist, a Coventry resident, on April 16.
Garza said DiFrancesca was inattentive when he rear-ended his client's Mazda Miata. The impact of the accident, Garza said, led to a traumatic rotator cuff tear to his client's right shoulder, for which surgery was performed.
Police gave DiFrancesca an infraction for following too closely.
Two years after the accident, Garza said, Geist "has some pain in his shoulder, but he is doing his best to get back to life without restrictions."
Jonathan Soto of Boston, Massachusetts-based Soto Law was co-counsel for the plaintiff's on the case.
Since no lawsuit was filed and the case was settled presuit, it's not clear what the defense's counterarguments would have been.
Related stories:
Police Cameras, Video Interview Help Cheshire Attorney Clinch Settlement After Car Crash
Caught on Tape: What This Stamford Lawyer Heard on an Insurer's Audio Clinched a $1.2M Settlement
Expert Testimony Leads to $100,000 Settlement in West Haven Fender Bender
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250