How Stratford Attorney Clinched $85,000 Settlement for His Client in MVA
Stratford attorney Ryan Miller has secured an $85,000 settlement for his client injured in a 2017 car wreck.
May 11, 2020 at 04:08 PM
4 minute read
Faced with a defense offer of only $10,000 for a client who suffered left knee pain from a car accident which was not cited in a workers' compensation claim, plaintiffs attorney Ryan Miller had to fight back on two fronts.
Miller, co-owner of Statford's Miller & Morilla, had to deal with the fact that not only was the left knee pain, which culminated with surgery following the February 2017 car accident, not cited in workers' compensation reports, but he also had to answer pushback from insurance defense counsel, who said his client, Michael David, didn't complain about the injury for more than a year.
"If an injury is not accepted or included in a workers' compensation claim, the insurance company will ask why they should pay for it," said Miller, who was not the attorney in the workers' compensation claim aspect of the case.
Christopher Hite of Stratford-based Rosenberg, Whewell & Hite represented David, a 53-year-old Bridgeport resident, in his workers' compensation claim. David was driving a company car at the time of the accident. The workers' compensation matter was resolved for $31,000 in August 2018. David had surgery on his left knee in 2019.
Miller settled his part of the case for $85,000 on April 20 via a Zoom mediation with mediator-attorney Thomas Barrett.
Hite said Monday the injuries to the left knee weren't cited in the workers' compensation claim "because we didn't have real medical substantiation at the time to pursue it."
Having no left knee injuries cited in the workers' compensation report was a burden Miller had to take on in his representation of his client for damages in the lawsuit he filed.
"The only thing accepted in the workers' compensation claim was for a cervical injury," Miller said Monday. The defense, Miller said, felt emboldened to mention that, since there was no mention of the left knee injury in the workers' compensation case, therefore, it wasn't that serious or the injuries to his left knee didn't come from the car accident, In addition, the defense maintained, David waited more than a year to complain about his left knee injuries.
Miller said he was skeptical of the defense's claim that his client waited more than 12 months to complain of those injuries.
"I basically combed through medical notes and found several occasions where my client did report to a doctor that he had left knee pain or radiating pain to his left leg," Miller said. "The doctors were focused more on his neck injury early on. It wasn't until after a year that anyone ordered an MRI for the left knee and left leg. Once the MRI came back, it tested positive for a tear. The doctors didn't take him seriously until we had the MRI and the tear."
The motor vehicle accident occurred on Route 25 South in Bridgeport in February 2017. According to Miller and a January 2019 lawsuit filed in Bridgeport Superior Court, a vehicle Patrick Gravelle was driving rear-ended David's work van. Gravelle was cited for following too closely.
Representing the insurance carrier, The Travelers Companies, was Laura Warsawski of the Hamden-based Law Offices of Cynthia M. Garraty. Warsawski did not respond to a request for comment Monday.
The defense in its answer to the lawsuit said it has insufficient knowledge as to the allegations spelled out in the lawsuit and left it to the plaintiff to prove his case.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250