Resuming Next Week: Connecticut Remote Civil Pretrials, Status Conferences, Trial Management Meetings
The chief administrative judge for civil matters in Connecticut has announced the Judicial Branch will resume its daily schedule of civil pretrials and trial management and status conferences in May.
May 12, 2020 at 01:31 PM
3 minute read
In an effort to move cases forward amid the COVID-19 pandemic and to avoid a significant backlog in the Superior Court system, the state's Judicial Branch has announced it will resume its daily schedule of remote civil pretrials and trial management and status conferences on May 19.
The cases couldn't be heard remotely until this month, Chief Judge Administrator for Civil Matters James Abrams said Tuesday because the court's information technology personnel needed to show all the Superior Court judges in the state how to use the technology.
"We just could not do it sooner because the training was not in place," said Abrams, who noted that hundreds of cases that were scheduled to be heard between March 23 and May 18 will be part of the court's backlog.
"Statewide, we are talking about a backlog in the high hundreds," the judge said.
Beginning to hear civil pretrials, and holding trial management and status conferences next week will help reduce the backlog when the courts reopen, Abrams said.
"Taking these steps will—down the line—I hope and expect make the tasks of hearing cases less daunting," he said.
Abrams said he expects telecommuting to continue for the long run.
"A lot of what we are doing, and will be doing, will continue remotely even when the pandemic is over," he said. "I do suspect that is how it will be. Working remotely will save the lawyers travel time. This is sort of a test drive for us. It's an exciting time to innovate with technology, and some of that technology will continue after we are back to normal."
|Years too late?
Attorneys who have cases before the courts, applauded the announcement. Others questioned why judges still needed to get up to speed with working remotely when the technology has been in place for decades.
"Some of this should have been in place years ago," said Hartford solo practitioner Ken Krayeske. "The federal courts have the capability of doing almost everything remotely. The state courts are behind in that effort. It's nice the state is catching up, but it shouldn't have taken a crisis to do so. I wish it had happened years ago."
Robert Reardon Jr. of New London-based The Reardon Law Firm said attorneys and judges miss being away from work.
"I know that both attorneys and judges are anxious to get to work from home. This is long-awaited, as we have been urging the Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association and our Judicial Branch to move forward as quickly as possible," he said. "We have a significant backlog of motions and pretrials that have been delayed because of COVID-19."
Reardon continued: "We are pleased that judicial has been able to organize so that they can take on the complex responsibility of doing their work remotely. It won't be easy, but it's essential."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250