Ex-Connecticut Lawyer Seeks Release From Prison Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
Attorney Jonathan Einhorn is asking a federal judge to release ex-Bristol attorney Jodi Zils Gagne from a Danbury prison amid fears of COVID-19. Zils Gagne has multiple sclerosis.
May 13, 2020 at 05:20 PM
4 minute read
As attorneys throughout the country are requesting compassionate releases of their clients due to COVID-19 concerns, Jonathan Einhorn is seeking the same for a sixth client: former Bristol attorney Jodi Zils Gagne.
Zils Gagne was sentenced to 46 months in prison in April 2019 for stealing more than $169,000 from clients. She reported to the Danbury Federal Correction Institute in July 2019. She still has about 35 months left on her sentence.
Einhorn, a New Haven solo practitioner, said Zils Gagne has multiple sclerosis. He said if Zils Gagne contracts the coronavirus, she would be at more risk than other prisoners because of her medical condition.
"She is in great danger, and more so than the average prisoner because of her MS," Einhorn said Wednesday. "The MS is the key to our argument. She doesn't have COVID-19, but the prison site she is at is one of the hot spots in the country for COVID-19."
|Lack of evidence?
Einhorn said of his five previous motions asking for the release of other clients, three were granted and two are pending.
He joins attorneys throughout the country asking for compassionate release for older prisoners and those with medical conditions that put them at high risk for COVID-19. Among them: President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman and Connecticut native Paul Manafort, 71, who was released from prison to home confinement on Wednesday because of COVID-19 concerns. Manafort was serving a seven-and-a-half-year sentence for bank and tax fraud.
But prosecutors are fighting release efforts.
Responding to Zils Gagne's May 1 compassionate plea motion, the government said it didn't believe a compassionate release of the attorney was warranted.
In court pleadings, prosecutors wrote, "While the government is not unsympathetic to Zils Gagne's concerns, the lack of evidence of compelling or personal or institutional considerations that place her at a heightened risk of serious disease, coupled with her victim's strong objections to her compassionate release, make her ill-suited for release at this time."
In his May 11 reply to the government's motion, Einhorn included a letter from a neurologist that indicated that multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease that makes her more susceptible to contracting the coronavirus. In addition, the motion states, Zils Gagne would have "different medical complications than the ordinary inmate."
Zils Gagne was a probate court-appointed conservator. Prosecutors alleged she had defrauded several people under the court's protection, including a client who was older than 90 and another who, like the attorney, had multiple sclerosis.
In the latest development, Einhorn said U.S. District Judge Vanessa Bryant could make her ruling "any day now."
"Judges have been acting quickly on these motions," he said. "I need to give them credit for that."
Late Tuesday evening, U.S. District Judge Michael Shea ruled that the conditions at three lockup facilities in Danbury were so bad that the warden needed to compile a list of at-risk prisoners for a furlough release, meaning they'd have to return to prison sometime down the road.
"What Judge Shea ruled is an alternative route for Jodi to come home," Einhorn said. "We'd hope that Judge Bryant gives her a compassionate release, but the other way is for the warden to give her a furlough. We don't care how she comes home, as long as she is safe."
Representing the government was David Huang, assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Connecticut. Tom Carson, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office, declined to comment.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250