'There Was No Lying in Her Bones': How Waterbury Lawyer Secured the Insurance Policy Limit for Injured Client
"They knew we were holding out for the entire policy, which was $100,000," plaintiffs counsel said.
May 19, 2020 at 07:34 PM
4 minute read
Faced with a defense offer of $18,000 for a likable plaintiff who had suffered injuries to her back and neck following a three-car accident, plaintiffs attorney Ron Etemi knew he'd have a great chance of getting the $100,000 policy limit, once his client gave her deposition.
And, for Etemi, a trial attorney at Trantolo & Trantolo in Waterbury, that is just what happened.
"They took her deposition, and you could tell that she was really impacted by this collision," said Etemi, who worked with his brother Lou on the case. "There was no lying in her bones. … That came through, and a jury would see that. Jurors are sometimes skeptical of motor vehicle claims, but here we have a genuine and honest person, and a sympathetic witness. And the defense knew that."
The two sides agreed May 4 to settle the case for plaintiff Cheryl Barrett for $100,000.
Another deciding factor in the defense not pushing back on the policy limit, Etemi believes, was the detailed report that Barrett's treating orthopedic physician outlined. The defense paid the settlement, via State Farm, soon after Barrett's deposition and the doctor's report, Etemi said.
"I think we were very persistent with defense counsel, and they knew we were holding out for the entire policy, which was $100,000," Etemi said.
According to Etemi and the April 2018 lawsuit filed in Waterbury Superior Court, defendant driver Marie Claudio struck a vehicle that Donald McCafferty was driving on Route 8 in Ansonia. The McCafferty vehicle then rear-ended Barrett's Toyota Camry.
Representing the defendant driver was Harrison Robbins-Pesce, an attorney with New Haven-based Mills Law Firm. Robbins-Pesce did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
In court pleadings, Robbins-Pesce argued that blame shouldn't fall on his client Claudio, because the second driver, McCafferty, was at fault. The pleadings state that McCafferty "failed to keep a proper look out in that he failed to apply his breaks in a timely manner."
But the other driver also pointed fingers. In court pleadings, the attorney for McCafferty put the blame on Barrett, saying the plaintiff had "brought her vehicle to a sudden and abrupt halt, without giving any warning of her intention to do so."
Claudio was the only driver in the three-car accident to whom police issued a citation. She admitted fault at her deposition, and was issued a police infraction for following too closely, Etemi said.
Meanwhile, plaintiff Barrett, a 54-year-old Ansonia resident, was wearing a seatbelt and was driving alone. She suffered injuries to her back, lumbar spine and neck, Etemi said. She received injections in her back to ease the pain, but didn't have to undergo surgery, her attorney said Tuesday.
Barrett continues to have a 16% permanent impairment to her lower back. She also incurred about $33,000 in medical expenses, Etemi said.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readAttorney Overcomes Low Medical Bills, Captures $1 Million Policy Limit
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
- 2Insurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
- 3Supply Chain Challenges and Opportunities Under the Second Trump Administration
- 4As Atlanta Partners Moved to Am Law 200 Firms at a Higher Rate in 2024, 2 New Arrivals Benefited
- 5A Tech-Enabled Approach to Professional Development Is the Path Forward for Young Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250