Santander Reaches $550 Million Settlement With 34 States Over Alleged Deceptive Auto Loan Practices
Santander, the nation's largest subprime auto financing company, settled claims of loan improprieties with 34 states to the tune of $550 million.
May 20, 2020 at 05:19 PM
3 minute read
Thirty-four states, including Connecticut, California, Florida, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania, have reached a $550 million settlement with automotive financing company Santander Consumer USA Inc. to reimburse consumers for alleged deceptive loan practices nationwide.
The multistate agreement with the nation's largest subprime auto financing company calls on the Dallas, Texas-based business to follow certain provisions, including knowing a customer's ability to repay their loans. It also prohibits the company from purchasing loans, if it knows consumers would have little or no money left after paying for housing and other expenses.
The settlement provides California with the bulk of the money, about $99 million for consumers in that state. New York will receive $27 million; New Jersey about $3.1 million; Florida about $7.7 million; Pennsylvania about $14.7 million, and $391,222 for Connecticut's consumers.
The settlement was good news for prosecutors in several states.
"For years, Santander put Connecticut borrowers at financial risk," Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said in a statement. "This settlement includes significant loan relief for customers as well as injunctive measures to assure that this kind of behavior won't happen again."
New York Attorney General Letitia James wrote in a statement: "As New Yorkers continue to struggle from the financial impact of the coronavirus, we have stopped this company from continuing its fraudulent practices and have helped keep more than $27 million in the pockets of New Yorkers. Santander defrauded desperate consumers by placing them into auto loans the company knew these customers could never afford to pay, resulting in defaults and negative ratings on consumers' credit reports."
And California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement: "Santander profited by approving high-cost loans to disadvantaged auto buyers who were doomed from the start. These predatory loan practices have hurt countless families who are being hit hard by today's economic climate. This settlement should be a warning to the industry that we are committed to protecting consumers from abusive business practices."
In California, for example, the press release from Becerra's office states that, with regard to his state, "Consumers with the lowest quality loans who had defaulted as of Dec. 31, 2019 and have not had their cars repossessed, will be allowed to keep their cars."
No one from Santander's media relations team responded to a request for comment Wednesday.
In February 2018, Connecticut and Santander reached a $2.9 million settlement over repossessed cars. In that case, the settlement money was used to credit, waive or refund the accounts of nearly 4,000 Connecticut consumers whose vehicles were repossessed. The company also agreed to pay a $100,000 fine.
Related stories:
M&T Bank In-House Attorney to Lead Santander US Legal Department
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readJudge Awards Over $350K in Attorney Fees in Data Breach Class Action Settlement
3 minute readSilk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
3 minute readPreparing for Change? These Leaders Have Already Done It. Plus, Managing Partner Survey Results
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 1—Managing Risk
- 3Change Is Coming to the EEOC—But Not Overnight
- 4Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 5Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250