Connecticut Lawyers Brace for Sharp Drop in Income This Year
"You have to be resilient," said BerkowitzHanna shareholder Christina Hanna. "We are in this for the long haul, no matter what."
May 26, 2020 at 07:21 AM
3 minute read
With few new cases reaching their offices amid stay-at-home orders and mandated lockdowns, Connecticut personal injury attorneys expect a significant drop in income, according to new data from a national survey.
ALM Media, whose publications include Law.com and the Connecticut Law Tribune, conducted a nationwide survey between April 1 and 23. It asked attorneys how the coronavirus outbreak has impacted their income, how their new-case volume has changed, and what is happening with potential new clients seeking representation. There were 24 Connecticut attorneys out of 292 total respondents.
Of the Connecticut attorneys, 58% reported they'd already seen a decrease in income due to COVID-19, while 33% said their income had stayed the same.
For Stewart M. Casper, a partner at Casper & de Toledo in Stamford, three recent cases he has been litigating have just brought in "substantial fees." But with courthouses closed, a key revenue driver for Casper's personal injury practice is the pressure that the offer-of-compromise statute puts on insurance companies to settle.
"When it is not paid, the interest rate runs at 8%, and that could be retroactive to the filing of the lawsuit," Casper said. "It becomes a business decision at some point for the insurance companies. That's why the offer-of-compromise statute that we have needs to be used, and needs to be used aggressively to disincentivize stonewalling."
The pandemic has led to economic hardships as unemployment climbed across the United States. As for Casper, "this is year is going to be a good year," thanks to recent case recoveries.
But most lawyers who took part in the survey did not share his view.
'You have to be resilient'
Of the Connecticut respondents, 63% are projecting decreased income in the future, while only 8% thought their income would remain the same.
When ALM asked them to quantify how much they felt they would lose in the future, 18% said they expected a 21% to 30% income drop. A plurality—about 35%—were bracing to lose between 11% and 20%, while about 18% expected their income to drop 10% or less.
The numbers confirm a sobering reality for Christina Hanna, a shareholder at BerkowitzHanna in Shelton, who has heard similar projections from colleagues at large and small firms, as well as solo offices within the state.
In her own practice, Hanna says she has seen a drop-off in new personal injury cases—as most of America is sheltered indoors—which will have an adverse effect on her income.
Although Hanna is receiving some new calls from potential clients, she is worried that cases before the coronavirus outbreak will soon be resolved, and a prolonged slowdown in new personal injury cases may meaningfully decrease her future revenue streams. As a result, she said she and other attorneys are exploring new types of claims.
"We're looking for any COVID-exposure cases, issues in the workplace or malpractice claims," Hanna said. "So that could be a new area developing. You have to be resilient. We are in this for the long haul, no matter what."
Read more:
The Numbers Are in: Attorney Income Nosedived Nationwide in the Last 2 Months
Florida Criminal Defense Lawyers Eyeing Civil Work? How COVID-19 is Affecting Attorney Income
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250