Connecticut Lawyers Brace for Sharp Drop in Income This Year
"You have to be resilient," said BerkowitzHanna shareholder Christina Hanna. "We are in this for the long haul, no matter what."
May 26, 2020 at 07:21 AM
3 minute read
With few new cases reaching their offices amid stay-at-home orders and mandated lockdowns, Connecticut personal injury attorneys expect a significant drop in income, according to new data from a national survey.
ALM Media, whose publications include Law.com and the Connecticut Law Tribune, conducted a nationwide survey between April 1 and 23. It asked attorneys how the coronavirus outbreak has impacted their income, how their new-case volume has changed, and what is happening with potential new clients seeking representation. There were 24 Connecticut attorneys out of 292 total respondents.
Of the Connecticut attorneys, 58% reported they'd already seen a decrease in income due to COVID-19, while 33% said their income had stayed the same.
For Stewart M. Casper, a partner at Casper & de Toledo in Stamford, three recent cases he has been litigating have just brought in "substantial fees." But with courthouses closed, a key revenue driver for Casper's personal injury practice is the pressure that the offer-of-compromise statute puts on insurance companies to settle.
"When it is not paid, the interest rate runs at 8%, and that could be retroactive to the filing of the lawsuit," Casper said. "It becomes a business decision at some point for the insurance companies. That's why the offer-of-compromise statute that we have needs to be used, and needs to be used aggressively to disincentivize stonewalling."
The pandemic has led to economic hardships as unemployment climbed across the United States. As for Casper, "this is year is going to be a good year," thanks to recent case recoveries.
But most lawyers who took part in the survey did not share his view.
|'You have to be resilient'
Of the Connecticut respondents, 63% are projecting decreased income in the future, while only 8% thought their income would remain the same.
When ALM asked them to quantify how much they felt they would lose in the future, 18% said they expected a 21% to 30% income drop. A plurality—about 35%—were bracing to lose between 11% and 20%, while about 18% expected their income to drop 10% or less.
The numbers confirm a sobering reality for Christina Hanna, a shareholder at BerkowitzHanna in Shelton, who has heard similar projections from colleagues at large and small firms, as well as solo offices within the state.
In her own practice, Hanna says she has seen a drop-off in new personal injury cases—as most of America is sheltered indoors—which will have an adverse effect on her income.
Although Hanna is receiving some new calls from potential clients, she is worried that cases before the coronavirus outbreak will soon be resolved, and a prolonged slowdown in new personal injury cases may meaningfully decrease her future revenue streams. As a result, she said she and other attorneys are exploring new types of claims.
"We're looking for any COVID-exposure cases, issues in the workplace or malpractice claims," Hanna said. "So that could be a new area developing. You have to be resilient. We are in this for the long haul, no matter what."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Election-Interference Prosecution Appears on Course to Wind Down
4 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome', DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250