'Nasty, Nasty Jerks': Plaintiffs Lawyers Claim Insurers Taking Advantage of COVID-19-Related Delays
Personal injury attorneys say insurers are using COVID-19-related court closures to leverage settlements. But insurance industry representatives say those allegations are unfair.
May 29, 2020 at 01:42 PM
4 minute read
Longtime Danbury attorney Alan Barry said he wasn't surprised when an insurance adjuster almost taunted him about filing a lawsuit during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The adjuster, Barry said, knew jury trials might not occur until 2021, and that plaintiffs are often anxious about receiving money they believe they are due.
Barry, of Alan Barry Associates, said the adjuster in a personal injury case asked him: "What will you do? File suit?"
"He told me the courts are closed and I couldn't go forward with it. I told him, 'Good luck and have a nice day,"' Barry said. "I don't tell them I will file suit, I just do it. … You can't avoid but be frustrated with their behavior. You can't let it get to you. It's just business."
Barry and other personal injury attorneys say insurance attorneys and adjusters have always played hardball. But now, they say the 2020 health pandemic has spawn new negotiation tactics.
Insurance attorneys and representatives, though, say such accusations aimed at them are unfair.
"Plaintiffs attorneys have an incentive to extract as much from insurance companies as they can. The accusations being made here that insurance companies are being nasty, nasty jerks has been made for decades and made inaccurately," said James Lynch, chief actuary and senior vice president of research and education at the Insurance Information Institute, a national industry association. "By and large, can there be individual cases where what these attorneys are describing is true? Yes. But there are also plaintiffs attorneys in individual cases that don't behave the way they should."
'Insurance companies are getting hammered'
Plaintiffs lawyer Andrew Garza has been on both sides.
He once represented insurance companies in personal injury and medical malpractice cases. Now, Garza, co-owner of Connecticut Trial Firm in Glastonbury, goes up against them as a plaintiffs lawyer.
He agrees that the companies often don't speed the litigation.
"They will wait you out, even more so during the coronavirus," Garza said.
But Michael Menapace, an insurance attorney and partner in Wiggin and Dana's insurance, cybersecurity and class action practices, agreed that claims of deliberate stalling were untrue.
"It sounds off because insurance companies are getting hammered right now. There are so many new suits being filed and so many claims coming in," Menapace said. "It tells me that lots of people are submitting claims and filing suit, and it doesn't make sense that someone is having a reaction that insurance companies want to delay this. They don't want to delay because they are already underwater with claims and lawsuits. It just doesn't make sense."
|Bound by law
But some personal injury attorneys, such as Barry, say their experiences paint a different picture.
"With COVID-19 there is a new level of excuses," Barry said. "The insurance companies believe that because of the economic circumstances people are in, that low-balling is more effective than ever. Most attorneys are playing hardball with insurance companies. Most attorneys are saying that—as your attorney—we don't recommend you accept this offer."
But insurance industry representatives, such as Lynch, said this is not the way the sector operates.
"Insurance companies are bound by law to settle claims fairly for all involved," he said. "Insurers have an obligation to their policyholders to do right by them. That is not to say that there aren't times when negotiations can become difficult."
In terms of how they analyze claims, though, Lynch said the companies have not changed litigation strategies.
"I don't think there is any significant changes in how insurance carriers do business pre- and post-COVID," he said. "The vast majority of claims are adjudicated, from the insurance companies point of view, fairly and with the interest of all of the stakeholders involved."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250