Don't Expect to Return to the Office Until Sept. 1: Some Connecticut Big Law Firms Won't Reopen for Months
"Going into the office will be voluntary," Day Pitney managing partner Thomas Goldberg said. "We expect many people will still work from home."
June 04, 2020 at 07:29 PM
4 minute read
Big Law in Connecticut is faced with a big decision: when to open its doors.
Some of have started to reopen, while others are waiting until summer or later, based on guidance from the office of Gov. Ned Lamont, the federal government, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and their peer law firms.
Here is a timeline of reopening dates from five of the state's largest law firms, outlining their plans to reopen, either partially or at full capacity.
• McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, ranked No. 191 on the Am Law 200 with about 251 attorneys in 13 offices, partially reopened its Connecticut offices in Hartford and Southport in late May, but is awaiting government guidance to resume normal operations.
"From our perspective, June 20 is the day we will have more guidelines from the state on full capacity," Suzanne Baldasare, the firm's New England managing partner, said.
Baldasare said staff safety is the top priority, amid strict guidelines for employees, including restricting social and business gatherings to no more than five people in a room.
"The attorneys are still encouraged to work remote, because they can," she said. "It will be great when we can get back to the new normal."
• Murtha Cullina managing partner Jennifer DelMonico said that firm's attorneys had been working from home for more than two months, until it gave the go-ahead for lawyers to return to the office on a limited basis, beginning May 26.
DelMonico said about a third of the firm's attorneys would be working on a rotating basis with several safety precautions in place. She said about a third of the firm's attorneys and staff would continue working from home full-time during the initial transition, while rotating schedules for those returning to work would allow Murtha Cullina to comply with state guidelines on limiting offices to 50% capacity or less.
Murtha Cullina has about 100 attorneys in six offices, including three offices in Connecticut.
• Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey is gearing to reopen June 8, managing partner Rick Street said.
The firm employs about 80 attorneys in Waterbury, New Haven and Stamford, where it is scheduled to partially reopen June 8. Visitors and staff must wear masks, and the offices won't operate at more than 45% occupancy on any given day.
"There was a lot of careful consideration of what the partners wanted," Street said. "Our primary concern, though, is the safety and health of our people. We weren't comfortable with reopening in May, but we are comfortable opening now."
• Shipman & Goodwin said it plans to continue its telework model with a phased return to the office, commencing in early July.
The law firm has 172 attorneys in eight offices, including five in Connecticut.
"This approach will permit us to adapt our office space and operations to reasonably accommodate social distancing and other precautionary measures," the firm said. "We anticipate a return to 25% office capacity utilization in July, an additional 25% office capacity utilization in August, and a more robust return in September and thereafter."
• Day Pitney managing partner Thomas Goldberg said senior staff have informed its employees that telecommuting will continue for at least three months.
"Do not expect to open the offices before Sept. 1," the firm said.
When the firm does open in September, Goldberg said, there will still be social distancing guidelines and the wearing of masks. "We will also have hand sanitizers and disinfectant wipes and we will make masks available for visitors."
The September date, Goldberg said, is for those who feel comfortable returning to work.
"Going into the office will be voluntary," he said. "We expect many people will still work from home."
Day Pitney sits at No. 164 on the Am Law 200 list, with about 254 attorneys in 13 offices, including four offices in Connecticut.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManaging Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
5 minute readConnecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
5 minute readGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250