Consumers Should Have a Dedicated Medical Emergency Fund
Out of those who had significant health care costs in 2018, 40% still held debt from those expenses by the end of the year.
June 04, 2020 at 10:31 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
If there were a financial 10 Commandments, establishing an emergency fund with three to six months' worth of living expenses would be near the top. Most experts will tell you this is a critical requirement for overall financial health and well-being.
What far fewer people are talking about, though, is the importance of creating a separate emergency fund earmarked for potential health care costs. By using health savings accounts, or HSAs, as dedicated medical emergency funds, savvy savers can take advantage of unparalleled HSA tax breaks and save big money on the health care costs they incur.
The reason emergency funds exist is to provide financial support in the case of a significant unforeseen expense, and health care costs are one of the top expenses most people will face. According to the Federal Reserve, 20% of adults incurred major, unexpected medical expenses in 2018, with a median cost of more than $1,000. And out of those who had significant health care costs, 40% still held debt from those expenses by the end of the year.
For many people, large and unexpected health care costs are unfortunately likely to be a question of when, rather than if. But according to an RxSaver survey, less than one in three people have a dedicated medical emergency fund set up.
This could be due to people thinking that when it comes to saving for health care expenses, all savings accounts are created equal. However, just by choosing HSAs as their medical emergency funds, smart consumers can unlock significant discounts on their health care costs. Money goes into an HSA tax-free or tax-deductible, earnings and interest grow tax-free, and funds withdrawn for qualified medical expenses are tax-free as well. There may be no such thing as a free lunch, but HSAs are the next best thing.
Since HSAs don't have use-it-or-lose-it limits, funds can stay growing until they're needed. HSA funds can even be invested to cover retirement health care costs. In addition, HSAs are portable, meaning they stay with account holders when they change jobs or retire. And finally, account holders can use HSA funds to pay for their spouse and tax dependents' medical expenses tax-free, even if they're on different health plans.
These features make HSAs the hands-down best choice for saving for current or future health care costs. And knowing how frequently unexpected medical expenses occur, building up HSA funds to cover those costs is an easy and powerful way to stretch savings farther.
Building up an emergency fund is an essential foundation for financial security. But rather than keeping everything in one account, consider dedicating a portion of savings into an HSA. By establishing HSAs as your medical emergency fund, you can ensure you're saving the most money possible on health care expenses and paving the way for a happy, healthy future.
James Denison is director of marketing for HealthSavings, one of the country's original health savings account (HSA) providers. HealthSavings empowers consumer-driven health plan participants to invest in institutional-class funds so they can grow their savings tax-free and meet their financial goals for a happy, healthy future. Denison is passionate about HSAs as a retirement strategy, health care consumerism, and medical cost transparency.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250