4 Superior Courthouses Scheduled to Open in June, Bringing Total to 13
The chief court administrator for the Judicial Branch has announced that four more courthouses will reopen later this month.
June 08, 2020 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
The Connecticut Judicial Branch has announced the reopening on a limited basis of four more courthouses in the state.
The announcement that the Superior Court buildings in Danbury, Milford, Stamford and Danielson will reopen June 29 will bring the number of open courthouses in the Superior Court system to 13.
The judicial branch had earlier announced a partial reopening of Superior Court courthouses in Middletown, Torrington and Rockville, beginning June 8.
In a statement, Chief Court Administrator Patrick Carroll III said safety is the top priority during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"We continue to plan for increasing expansion of the branch's physical footprint and all business operations in a way that places personal safety of the public, the bar and employees at the forefront, while also balancing the requirement to continue to provide expanded access." Carroll wrote.
In addition to the June 29 reopening of the four courthouses, Carroll said the courts are also planning to expand their hours and days of operations, after reductions during the pandemic.
Starting June 15, all open courthouse locations will be open each day, Monday through Friday. The hours for the public will be 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Mondays, and 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Tuesday through Friday.
The courts will further expand their hours, beginning July 6, when they are set to open to the public from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.
"In addition to expanding the courthouse locations, business operations have rapidly expanded across all divisions by the use of remote technology," Carroll said in the statement. "In just a few weeks' time, family court has held over 600 remote status or settlements conferences, and disposed of more than 300 divorce cases remotely."
Carroll continued: "Civil court had conducted close to 1,000 remote events and has ruled on more than 7,000 short calendar matters. Juvenile court is holding remote detention hearings each day of operation and reviewing permanency plans remotely."
Carroll also said the branch will expand the handling of criminal matters beginning June 8.. On that day, he said, judges will begin to conduct remote pretrial conferences in criminal cases.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250