New Haven Attorney Sentenced Over Income Tax Violations
A federal judge Monday ruled that a New Haven attorney wouldn't be going to prison for tax offenses. William Palmieri was sentenced to probation, community service and ordered to pay more than $200,000 in back taxes and interest.
July 13, 2020 at 04:49 PM
4 minute read
Despite the government's request that a New Haven attorney who pleaded guilty to income tax violations be sentenced to prison, a federal judge Monday did otherwise and sentenced William Palmieri to three years' probation.
The judge also ordered him to perform 150 hours of community service, and to pay back taxes and interest totaling more than $200,000.
The 56-year-old Palmieri, whose small practice specializes in civil rights law, pleaded guilty in December to two counts of willful failure to pay income taxes. The government said Palmieri, who lives in Bethany, owed $227,709 in taxes, interest and penalties. He had faced a maximum of two years in prison.
But U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill of District of Connecticut Monday sided with the defense, who maintained that because of past health issues, his personal background and family responsibilities, Palmieri should be spared jail time.
The defense argued in its June 29 memorandum in aid of sentencing that "a probationary sentence, with a special condition of home confinement" would be reasonable given the circumstances.
The memorandum noted Palmieri had never been in trouble with the law before and had a difficult childhood and adult life. The attorney, the memorandum said, had a mother who was physically and verbally abusive toward him. It also noted that, in 2009, the attorney "became gravely ill" as his colon had ruptured. He spent time in the hospital where, the memorandum said, "it was touch and go at times."
Palmieri, the memorandum said, was hospitalized at least four more times with recurrences of diverticulitis. He later, the memorandum said, became a diabetic and "is morbidly obese and he continues to take numerous medications." All the while, the memorandum said, Palmieri, who was taking care of his two children, separated from his partner who later moved out of his house.
"The punishment [of prison] would be severe and life-altering for Mr. Palmieri and those who depend on him," the defense wrote in its memorandum.
Palmieri's attorney, Robert Frost Jr. of Frost Bussert in New Haven, didn't respond to a request for comment Monday. Palmieri also didn't respond to a request for comment.
The government, though, had a different view.
In its July 7 memorandum in aid of sentencing, the prosecution wrote: "The government submits that the duration of the defendant's conduct, going back to 2005, the manner in which the defendant took steps to make it more difficult for the IRS to collect payment, and his repeated decisions to expend funds on an expensive house, private school education, fancy car and other trips and experiences he could not afford given his existing financial obligations to the IRS warrant a sentence involving a period of incarceration."
The government's memorandum continued: "It would be hard for the general public to consider a sentence 'just' if the defendant's punishment is simply to pay the tax obligation he previously owes—particularly as the amount he chose not to pay to date far exceeds what many in Connecticut earn each year."
Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Schmeisser prosecuted the case. Thomas Carson, spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Connecticut, said the office would have no comment.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250