Connecticut Lawyer Helped Spark Novartis' $729 Million Settlement
On July 1, the federal government announced it had settled a $729M whistleblower lawsuit with Swiss drugmaker Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. The litigation began in Connecticut in 2011 and the government later became involved in the matter, which ended up taking nine years to resolve.
July 14, 2020 at 12:50 PM
5 minute read
When former Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. sales representative and whistleblower Oswald Bilotta reached out to a Connecticut lawyer, he didn't know what could come next.
He called the Chester, Connecticut, offices of Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah in 2011 with allegations that Swiss drugmaker Novartis was providing kickbacks to doctors and others to promote their drugs. And he said he could prove it.
This led law firm founder and partner James Miller to recognize he had an important case that could be worth millions.
Miller at the time, though, had no idea that nine years later that thanks to intervention from the federal government, Novartis would pay $729 million to settle claims that it violated the federal False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statute.
According to the government, the company provided doctors with cash payments and lavish meals to have them prescribe its brands of cardiovascular and diabetes drugs.
The settlement was signed off on July 1.
Miller, the lead attorney on the whistleblower case, worked out of the Chester office of the law firm, which has eight U.S. offices and operations in London and Italy.
Miller said the federal government expressed interest in the case soon after his firm filed suit in 2011. The federal government joined the case in 2013. Miller's firm provided pertinent information over the years, and remained involved to the end.
"The most important information that we provided to the government in connection with this case was Mr. Bilotta's detailed knowledge and information regarding Novartis' sales practices in the New York metropolitan area, as supplemented by the extensive work that we performed with our investigators in establishing the nature of the scheme," Miller said. "We and Mr. Bilotta literally worked on this matter on a weekly, if not daily, basis throughout the entire pendency of the lawsuit."
Miller said his firm "personally incurred millions of dollars in expenses" and had a team of 30 lawyers and other professional over the course of nine years.
"It was a real partnership between us and the government," he said.
At one point, Miller said, his client agreed to be wired and to attend Novartis events at the behest of the government.
"We were mostly holding his hand during the time he was being wired, but we were acting as counsel and protected his interest the best we could," Miller said.
The alleged kickbacks, Miller said, were "documented many times because Mr. Bilotta wore a wire. The wire showed there were bribes taking place."
Novartis, the government said in a release, organized thousands of "sham educational events at high-end restaurants and other venues, paid exorbitant speaker fees to doctors who gave no meaningful presentations, and provided expensive meals and alcohol to doctor attendees and their guests."
The government statement continues: "For more than a decade, Novartis spent hundreds of millions of dollars on so-called speaker programs … that were nothing more than bribes to get doctors across the country to prescribe Novartis drugs."
No one from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, the lead prosecutors, responded to a request for comment.
"The government kept us abreast throughout, and we continued to litigate the case," said Miller, who noted his firm spent "tens of thousands of hours on this case."
The payoff for his client as a whistleblower, Miller said, is expected to be massive.
"We expect Mr. Bilotta will receive about $100 million because he was the whistleblower," Miller said. As for his firm, Miller said, "The attorney fees we will be getting have not yet been decided. We are still in the middle of negotiations."
The lead attorney for Novartis was Evan Chesler, chairman of Cravath, Swaine & Moore, based in New York City. Chesler didn't respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Novartis directed media inquiries to its website, where CEO Vas Narasimhan wrote: "Today's settlements are consistent with Novartis' commitment to resolve and learn from legacy compliance matters, We are a different company today, with new leadership, a stronger culture, and a more comprehensive commitment to ethics embedded at the heart of our company."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1House Passes Bill to Add Federal Judgeships in Face of Biden Veto Threat
- 2As AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
- 3Texas Lawyer, Client Sued for $10 Million Over Bitcoin Mining Deal
- 4Final Misconduct Hearing Date Impending for Fulton Judge
- 5Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250