Connecticut Federal Courts Postpone Criminal Jury Selection, Trials
Jury selection for criminal trials in Connecticut federal courts have been pushed back from Sept. 1 to Nov. 2. We speak to Stefan Underhill, the chief judge for the Connecticut federal court system, about the change and what lies ahead.
July 16, 2020 at 01:35 PM
4 minute read
Criminal jury selection and trials in federal courts in Connecticut have been pushed back from Sept. 1 to Nov. 2.
U.S. District Chief Judge Stefan Underhill of the District of Connecticut made the announcement via a posting on the federal court website. The announcement also states that—due to the COVID-19 pandemic—civil jury selection and trials are still slated for Sept. 1.
Underhill told the Connecticut Law Tribune on Thursday it was becoming evident that returning to criminal trials Sept. 1 was just not feasible.
"We had no choice but to push back the date of criminal trials because of concerns of jury safety, lawyer safety, the safety of defendants and the safety of court personnel," Underhill said.
Underhill continued: "Two things have to be true before we return to normal. It has to be safe and people have to perceive it's safe. There may be a period of time when we achieve No. 1 and when we achieve No. 2. Jury service is a civil responsibility, but it shouldn't be something where people fear for their safety."
The state's federal courthouses are located in Bridgeport, New Haven and Hartford.
Underhill says he receives guidance on the opening of the federal courthouses from "watching what the government does, looking closely at what the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) is recommending and by listening to the medical experts. We are also keeping a finger on the pulse of the community."
The coronavirus has and will force the court administration, Underhill said, to be creative and to think out of the box.
One possibility being considered, Underhill said, "is putting jurors in the gallery and the witnesses in the jury box. That way, people are more spread out."
Civil trials, he said, are resuming before criminal trials for several reasons, including the fact that, in most cases, more people attend criminal trials than civil trials, and it's harder to social distance.
"The public often doesn't show up for civil trials, and that's another reason why civil trials go before criminal ones," Underhill said. "Criminal trials also have 12 jurors and there is more interest in them than civil cases. Usually, in criminal cases, a victim wants to be present and you often have members of the media present."
While it's hard, Underhill said, to pinpoint how many weeks or months of a backlog there will be in cases due to the health pandemic, he did say, "we are approaching 300 defendants on the criminal side who need to have cases resolved either by a trial or guilty pleas. There is more of a backlog on the criminal side."
Safety protocols in the federal courthouses continue, the judge said.
"Everyone is required to wear a mask, and courtrooms have been marked off to enforce the six-foot rule," Underhill said. "Literally, we have blue painters tape that identify places to sit that are six feet away. It's all very frustrating, but we are in a pandemic and we really don't have much of a choice."
As of late Wednesday afternoon, and according to the office of the governor, Connecticut had recorded 45,653 cases of COVID-19 and 3,505 deaths from the virus.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250