Precedent-Setting Agreement Aids Children With Disabilities, Lawyers Say
A recent settlement between a day care facility with offices in Connecticut and Pennsylvania and the government is being called "precedent-setting."
July 16, 2020 at 06:10 PM
3 minute read
In what attorneys who represent children with disabilities are calling a precedent-setting agreement, a day care facility with 22 centers in Connecticut and Pennsylvania will pay $20,000 to a Connecticut family whose 2-year-old son was denied Diastat, which is medicine to treat epilepsy.
"This is definitely precedent-setting. Hanging out there were several cases decided on the other side," said Jonathan Chappell, an attorney with Feldman, Perlstein & Greene in Farmington.
Chappell, who was not involved in the case of the 2-year-old, but who specializes in representing children with disabilities, said the government's agreement with Tender Care Learning Centers "will be helpful for lawyers in future cases. Defendants should work on ADA [Americans with Disabilities Act] compliance to make sure they are aware of these kinds of cases."
Bonnie Roswig, the attorney who brought the complaint that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Connecticut agreed to follow up on, called the agreement "something that has never happened before. There was a case out of Illinois in 2016 that involved a young adult in a city recreation program who had epileptic seizures but the judge in that case said administering Diastat was not a reasonable accommodation under the ADA. The Connecticut ruling is different and is precedent-setting."
Not only should the agreement with Tender Care Learning Centers help attorneys who specialize in representing those with disabilities, it's also a warning to similar day care facilities, Roswig said.
"They better understand that they are advised to comply with the ADA," said Roswig, director of the Disability Rights Project with the Center for Children's Advocacy in Hartford. "I believe this agreement can affect what happens in other states."
In the case at hand, Roswig said, the toddler attended the Tender Care Learning Centers in Hamden. In 2018, Roswig said, the boy's family was told without notice that beginning immediately they'd no longer administer the medication if he'd have a crisis.
Roswig said the $20,000 was based on damages and emotional distress to the family, who reside in Cheshire.
As part of the agreement, Tender Care Learning Centers will retrain its staff so they know how to administer the medication and will educate staff at all its facilities to comply with ADA guidelines.
"The agreement underscores the concept that individuals with disabilities should not be discriminated against. It's as simple as that," Roswig said.
Representing the government was Ndidi Moses, assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Connecticut. Thomas Carson, spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's office, said the office would have no comment on the matter.
Frank Reabe, chief executive officer and director of the learning centers, signed the agreement. He also did not respond to a request for comment.
According to the Epilepsy Foundation, about 3 million adults and 400,000 children have epilepsy in the United States.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readDeluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Trending Stories
- 1Texas Lawyer, Client Sued for $10 Million Over Bitcoin Mining Deal
- 2Final Misconduct Hearing Date Impending for Fulton Judge
- 3Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
- 4How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
- 5Insurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250