No Start Date for Connecticut Jury Trials, But Bench Trials Resume
State bench trials kicked back up remotely in Connecticut on Wednesday. It's still not clear when jury trials, remote or in person, will resume.
July 17, 2020 at 05:16 PM
4 minute read
They are back!
While it's not clear when jury trials will restart in Connecticut, bench trials in the Nutmeg State have resumed.
What is believed to be the first bench trial since the health pandemic shut down court business in March—the trade secret case of East Hartford's Dur-A-Flex against 10 defendants—resumed remotely Wednesday in front of Judge Thomas Moukawsher, who presides over complex litigation in Hartford Superior Court.
The trial, which is being conducted on the Microsoft Teams platform, is "a step in the right direction," said Jonathan Shapiro, a Middletown partner who is representing six of the defendants in the matter.
"My immediate reaction when I heard we were moving forward with the trial was 'It's a relief to be going back.' Judicial had a lot to catch up on technology-wise in the last few months, but it appears it's paying off," said Shapiro, who is with Aeton Law Partners. "It's not a sprint here."
Shapiro continued: "To the judge's credit, because of the time needed in this case, he made this a top priority."
Dur-A-Flex, Shapiro said, accused one of its former chemists of misappropriating trade secrets and giving them to a competitor. Dur-A-Flex provides floor and wall systems for various industries.
The case, Shapiro said, resumed all day on Wednesday and Thursday, and half a day on Friday. The trial is expected to continue into August, he said.
"It's a really complex case," he said. "There are more than 900 marked exhibits. Evidence in the case has been provided off and on for two years." Through Microsoft Teams, Shapiro said, both sides this week "were introducing evidence and examining witnesses."
The law firm Rogin Nassau in Hartford is representing the plaintiff, while there are several firms representing the defendants.
Shapiro said the return of the trial the past two and a half days has seen some technical glitches on the part of the Judicial Branch. But he said they were all minor.
"There was some delay, but they got quickly resolved," he said.
Shapiro said attorneys are eager to get back to work, but he said some have concerns about doing so remotely.
"I've heard from both sides," Shapiro said. "Some people, like myself, are more than willing to do this remotely. Others are apprehensive."
Ron Etemi, a trial attorney for Trantolo & Trantolo in Waterbury, said attorneys "are patiently waiting for something to happen with jury trials. It's a good sign that we are doing bench trials, but I think we need to have some plans and options in place for jury trials."
Jury trials can be held in the courtrooms or remotely, but, he said, it's past time to start looking at options.
"Remote jury trials can be an option," Etemi said. "But we need something to happen. Courtrooms are large enough, many of them, to apply social distancing. In a nutshell, bench trials are a test case to see how well the technology can hold up in a jury trial. I have faith that Judicial will come up with something."
Rhonda Hebert, a spokeswoman for the state Judicial Branch, said in a statement that Moukawsher's trial is one example of "evidentiary hearings being conducted by remote means. The scope and nature of remote, evidentiary hearings is expanding daily."
It's not clear when jury trials will begin in state courts. This week, the federal courts in Connecticut announced jury selection and jury trials would be pushed back from Sept. 1 to Nov. 2.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250