No Start Date for Connecticut Jury Trials, But Bench Trials Resume
State bench trials kicked back up remotely in Connecticut on Wednesday. It's still not clear when jury trials, remote or in person, will resume.
July 17, 2020 at 05:16 PM
4 minute read
They are back!
While it's not clear when jury trials will restart in Connecticut, bench trials in the Nutmeg State have resumed.
What is believed to be the first bench trial since the health pandemic shut down court business in March—the trade secret case of East Hartford's Dur-A-Flex against 10 defendants—resumed remotely Wednesday in front of Judge Thomas Moukawsher, who presides over complex litigation in Hartford Superior Court.
The trial, which is being conducted on the Microsoft Teams platform, is "a step in the right direction," said Jonathan Shapiro, a Middletown partner who is representing six of the defendants in the matter.
"My immediate reaction when I heard we were moving forward with the trial was 'It's a relief to be going back.' Judicial had a lot to catch up on technology-wise in the last few months, but it appears it's paying off," said Shapiro, who is with Aeton Law Partners. "It's not a sprint here."
Shapiro continued: "To the judge's credit, because of the time needed in this case, he made this a top priority."
Dur-A-Flex, Shapiro said, accused one of its former chemists of misappropriating trade secrets and giving them to a competitor. Dur-A-Flex provides floor and wall systems for various industries.
The case, Shapiro said, resumed all day on Wednesday and Thursday, and half a day on Friday. The trial is expected to continue into August, he said.
"It's a really complex case," he said. "There are more than 900 marked exhibits. Evidence in the case has been provided off and on for two years." Through Microsoft Teams, Shapiro said, both sides this week "were introducing evidence and examining witnesses."
The law firm Rogin Nassau in Hartford is representing the plaintiff, while there are several firms representing the defendants.
Shapiro said the return of the trial the past two and a half days has seen some technical glitches on the part of the Judicial Branch. But he said they were all minor.
"There was some delay, but they got quickly resolved," he said.
Shapiro said attorneys are eager to get back to work, but he said some have concerns about doing so remotely.
"I've heard from both sides," Shapiro said. "Some people, like myself, are more than willing to do this remotely. Others are apprehensive."
Ron Etemi, a trial attorney for Trantolo & Trantolo in Waterbury, said attorneys "are patiently waiting for something to happen with jury trials. It's a good sign that we are doing bench trials, but I think we need to have some plans and options in place for jury trials."
Jury trials can be held in the courtrooms or remotely, but, he said, it's past time to start looking at options.
"Remote jury trials can be an option," Etemi said. "But we need something to happen. Courtrooms are large enough, many of them, to apply social distancing. In a nutshell, bench trials are a test case to see how well the technology can hold up in a jury trial. I have faith that Judicial will come up with something."
Rhonda Hebert, a spokeswoman for the state Judicial Branch, said in a statement that Moukawsher's trial is one example of "evidentiary hearings being conducted by remote means. The scope and nature of remote, evidentiary hearings is expanding daily."
It's not clear when jury trials will begin in state courts. This week, the federal courts in Connecticut announced jury selection and jury trials would be pushed back from Sept. 1 to Nov. 2.
Related stories:
Connecticut Federal Courts Postpone Criminal Jury Selection, Trials
Need to Know: 8 Connecticut Superior Court Courthouses to Open in July
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
- 2Divided State Supreme Court Clears the Way for Child Sexual Abuse Cases Against Church, Schools
- 3From Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
- 4‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?
- 5LinkedIn Accused of Sharing LinkedIn Learning Video Data With Meta
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250