Connecticut Supreme Court building in Hartford. Photo: Michael Marciano/ALM Panhandler's Case Made It All the Way to State Supreme Court. Here's the Biggest Takeaway
The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled on a case that dealt with the rules on jury instruction related to lesser charges.
September 18, 2020 at 06:21 PM
3 minute read
In a case that focused on whether a jury should have been instructed on a possible lesser charge for a man arrested several times for panhandling, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Superior Court judge acted properly in not giving those instructions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Severe Emotional Distress': DC Judge Finds Iran Liable in 3 US Hostage-Takings
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
