A Sore Loss Does Not Justify Undermining the Electoral Process
Counting every vote is a bedrock principle of democracy. No one, not the president and not any of his attorneys, has any business undermining the voting process.
November 10, 2020 at 10:55 AM
4 minute read
As of this writing, former Vice President Joe Biden has taken the lead in Georgia and Pennsylvania and has been declared the winner, while President Trump has whittled away at Biden's lead in Arizona. After a tumultuous couple of days needed to count 100 million paper absentee ballots in addition to Election Day votes, it appears that when all the votes are tallied, President Trump will have lost the election, and Joe Biden will be the next president of the United States
Losing hurts. And in a public arena, such as a national election, losing must sting all the more. But at the end of the day, it is the duty of the candidates to accept the choice of the voters, however difficult. That choice is the most essential principle of democracy, and upon that principle rests the secure knowledge and confidence that the government is of the people, by the people and for the people. Candidates, winners and losers alike, must respect and honor the electoral process in every election.
But when faced with the possibility that he legitimately may have been voted out, President Trump held a grievance-filled press conference on Thursday claiming that "they" were trying to "steal the election from us." Doubling down on his early Wednesday morning speech alleging a "fraud on the American people" and urging vote counting to stop on election night while he was still ahead, the President of the United States accused pretty much everyone, including pollsters, the media and Democrats who are somehow running the "voting apparatus" in (historically red) states, of election interference, voter suppression, fraud and corruption. He insinuated that the mail-in ballots that he had urged his supporters not to cast, which have overwhelmingly come in from Democrats, were manufactured. He called into question the diligent work being done by election officials, suggesting that they had rigged the election in Biden's favor, and challenged the integrity of the election itself. It was a shameful attempt at undermining the election process and did absolutely nothing to unite the country or respect the will of the people.
At this, we really need to say enough. Surely, irrespective of our political differences, we can all agree on a few fundamental things. Counting every vote is a bedrock principle of democracy. No one, not the president and not any of his attorneys, has any business undermining the voting process. If there is a legitimate cause of action that can be supported by evidence, then by all means bring it, but if not, don't criticize the electoral process as corrupt and fraudulent when you're losing. No one should be suggesting that Republican legislatures should seat electors that cast votes for the president rather than their state's winner. This undermining of the electoral process serves no purpose other than to further polarize Americans and attempt to delegitimize the next president, whether it's Joe Biden or Donald Trump. Enough is enough.
We do not publish this editorial lightly, and we are mindful that some may see it as partisan. We do not view this as a matter of taking sides against one candidate or another. The inflammatory language employed by the president seeks to undermine the integrity of the election and cast doubt on its results. We cannot remain silent lest our silence provide tacit approval, and we speak now only because we are compelled to, as lawyers who stand for the rule of law, because the people have a right to be confident in the result of the election. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, no one, not even the president, should be undermining that.
It's time for the country to unite. Let's move forward together into the next stage of American history.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250