A 109-day trade secrets trial in Connecticut state court involving the formula for a type of cement floor-coating has ended in a mixed decision, with six defendants being held liable and four not, although motions for reconsideration and appeal notices have followed the Nov. 23 decision in quick succession.

The East Hartford-based Dur-A-Flex company, which describes itself as a manufacturer of “high-performance, poured resinous floor and wall systems,” launched the lawsuit in Hartford Superior Court in 2014. Dur-A-Flex originally named only one defendant, Samet Dy, a chemist who’d formerly worked for it before leaving in 2013 and later going on to work as a contractor for similar commercial and industrial flooring companies.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]