(l-r) Plaintiffs Shawn Danielson, Ashley Platt and Patricia Black recently were awarded a total of $275,000 following a jury trial on their gender discrimination and retaliation claims. Courtesy photo
It was the discrepancy in pay among three female plaintiffs and their male peer, and an apparent backdated letter that helped sway a jury to rule in favor of the plaintiffs in a gender discrimination and retaliation lawsuit, according to the women’s attorney, Deborah McKenna.
Following three days of evidence and five and a half hours of deliberations, a federal jury in New Haven handed down a $275,000 verdict to plaintiffs Patricia Black, Ashley Platt and Shawn Danielson.
Evidence in signature line
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
