![Connecticut Supreme Court building in Hartford, CT. June 3, 2020. Photo: Michael Marciano/ALM](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/391/2022/03/Connecticut-Supreme-Court-Building-006-767x633.jpg)
Court Divided: Did Prosecutors Show 7-Day Delay in Arrest Warrant Execution Was Reasonable Under 'Swebilius'?
"Swebilius had put the state on notice that they were required to establish, by the preponderance of evidence, that they exercised reasonable diligence in executing a warrant within the statute of limitations or explain why their failure to do so was reasonable under the circumstances. They failed to do so here," Freeman's attorney, James Mortimer of The Mortimer Law Firm in Fairfield, explained Wednesday.
September 01, 2022 at 05:10 PM
6 minute read
In a 4-3 majority, the Connecticut Supreme Court reversed the appellate court's judgment affirming a defendant's criminal conviction, concluding that state prosecutors failed to show sufficient evidence to explain the delay in issuing an arrest warrant and executing it past time limitations.
Terry Freeman challenged his felony conviction from a robbery that allegedly occurred at a liquor store on Nov. 29, 2013. Freeman argued that his arrest warrant wasn't executed until Dec. 6, 2018, a seven-day (or five, not counting weekends) delay after the five-year statute of limitations expired. Freeman further claimed that prosecutors failed to show reasonable evidence that they acted diligently in executing the warrant.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Supreme Court May Limit Federal Prosecutions Over 'Misleading' but True Statements Supreme Court May Limit Federal Prosecutions Over 'Misleading' but True Statements](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c8/77/f124cba543fa8136c4921935f5c2/federal-deposit-insurance-corporation-building-1-767x633.jpg)
Supreme Court May Limit Federal Prosecutions Over 'Misleading' but True Statements
![Biden's Top Supreme Court Lawyer Talks Argument Prep, Emergency Docket Ahead of New Term Biden's Top Supreme Court Lawyer Talks Argument Prep, Emergency Docket Ahead of New Term](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/09/Elizabeth-Prelogar-767x633-4.jpg)
Biden's Top Supreme Court Lawyer Talks Argument Prep, Emergency Docket Ahead of New Term
![Edgar Tatum Spent Decades in Prison. Now Court Acknowledges Unreliability of Evidence Edgar Tatum Spent Decades in Prison. Now Court Acknowledges Unreliability of Evidence](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/391/2024/07/evidence-767x633.jpg)
Edgar Tatum Spent Decades in Prison. Now Court Acknowledges Unreliability of Evidence
4 minute read![4 Opinions, 1 Case: Discovery Issue Deeply Divides Justices 4 Opinions, 1 Case: Discovery Issue Deeply Divides Justices](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/391/2024/06/Lawyer-Examining-Documents-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250