Preventing Painful Losses From Criminal Scams: Complacency Precedes Disaster
Increasingly sophisticated criminals, who understand exactly how work flow and process occurs in law offices, can inflict exponential harm.
September 01, 2022 at 08:24 AM
5 minute read
Best PracticesI first heard the words "complacency precedes disaster" from my brother, who is a commercial airline pilot. When I asked him about it, he explained that industry experience was that no amount of training or education could would stop people from making simple errors with profound consequences when things get routine, guards are dropped and safety protocols are ignored. While a crash, either actual or narrowly avoided, will sharpen folks' attention, their level of care and attention will inevitably begin to wane after a while. Then bad things will happen. It's the same for us lawyers. From what I hear, it's epidemic right now.
The day I get up and don't find an e-mail in my in-box from a potential client, often through AVVO or some other lawyer finder asking me if I do breach of contract or collection cases, will be the first day. After lunch, I'll often get another one or two. These scams involve sending you a counterfeit check, either as a retainer, or in settlement of some claim you just sent a demand letter about. The checks are 100% mimics of valid checks of real businesses and institutions, so it's not easy to figure out whether they're legit or not. They'll clear your bank alright, but they'll be reversed weeks or months later when their real nature is discovered. Meantime, you've either refunded the unearned fee ("case settled, take 20% for your trouble and send me back the rest") or deducted your fee and sent the proceeds to your bogus client. Because these transactions went through your IOLTA account, the reversal will either cause your account to be overdrawn or other clients' money being used to pay the losses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllToo Zealous? Advocacy Looks Different Now—6 Takeaways From Winning Litigators
5 minute readThink About It: Being Better than AI Requires Contemplation
'There Is Going to Be Pushback': Personal Injury Lawyers Fire Back at Critic Over Pricing and Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Are Suing Ex-Clients More Frequently, Unwilling to Leave 6-Figure Legal Fees on Table
Trending Stories
- 1Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 2Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 3The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 4Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250