Timothy D. Bleasdale, left, and Tracy M. Collins, right, of Waller Smith & Palmer. Courtesy photos
In a land dispute, the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the judgment that the plaintiff has easement, not adverse possession, over a parcel of land next to the property.
The Supreme Court, however, did not agree with the defendant’s counterclaim for slander of title, and vacated the award of attorney fees and costs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
