In December I published a Facebook post, “After 26 Years, Prosecuted Based On A Grammar  Error.”

It described how an abusive assistant chief disciplinary counsel is prosecuting me for a supposed violation that depends on him implying the words “or not” in the rule for contingency fee agreements to change its grammatical meaning. As ACDC Douglas Butler explained to me in an official letter in response to my asking for the specific deficiency in my supposedly “too vague” fee agreement which he was prosecuting as misconduct:

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]