A Connecticut Appellate Court panel affirmed the decision of the Compensation Review Board to uphold the Workers’ Compensation commissioner for the Eighth District’s determination that a per diem employee was not entitled to full salary disability benefits.
The plaintiff, George Kelly, argued that the commissioner’s decision should not have relied on a supersedence appendix and cost sheet for “substantive purposes” and failed to assign the burden of proving the plaintiff was not entitled to benefits to the defendant, the opinion said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
