A Connecticut Appellate Court disagreed with a plaintiff who wanted to expand the term “supervisor” to include employees who can’t take “tangible employment actions,” but who can exert control over the day-to-day conditions of a subordinate’s work.

In an employment discrimination case, the plaintiff argued that the term “supervisor,” as defined by the U.S. appellate Court, was too narrow under the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, but the state Appellate Court disagreed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]