Connecticut Is Updating its Environmental Justice Regulations
We applaud and encourage updating of the state’s environmental justice regulations and recommend the working group engage with communities.
December 19, 2024 at 10:30 AM
5 minute read
Connecticut is in the midst of rewriting its environmental justice regulations for the first time since the inaugural regulations were enacted fifteen years ago. The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection is convening a working group of stakeholders to assist in drafting regulations over the next two years based on the lessons learned and experienced gained. The rule making will, for the first time, require the DEEP to evaluate the cumulative impacts of select industrial and high intensity facilities located in low-income communities or distressed municipalities when issuing permits for such facilities. We support the goal of updating the law to better understand and account for both the environmental externalities and the economic benefits of such facilities.
Environmental Justice was initially an umbrella term that evolved out of the environmental and civil rights gains of the 1960s and 1970s to describe a range of issues including the inequities and adverse impacts resulting from the siting of locally unwanted and often toxic land uses, such as hazardous waste landfills, incinerators, power plants and other high intensity uses in poor and minority communities. The environmental justice concept was refined in the 1980s in part by a widely publicized United States General Accounting Office study entitled Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. The GAO study brought into focus and provided national data demonstrating the disturbing pattern of siting hazardous waste landfills. It showed that, at the time, three out of four hazardous waste landfills examined were located in communities where African Americans made up at least 26% of the population, and whose family incomes were below the poverty level. From there, additional studies were conducted at the federal, state and local levels, and the expanded data demonstrated similar patterns not just for landfills but also for sewage treatment facilities, power plants and other high-polluting uses.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElected but Convicted: Attempts to Delay President-Elect's Sentencing Were Unfounded and Exhausted
4 minute readSpecial Series Part 6: If the Budget Guardrails Are Unconstitutional, What Happens Next?
Special Series Part 5: The State’s Bond Lock Impermissibly Delegates Legislative Authority
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250