Expressing concern about costs, the Superior Court Rules Committee voted Thursday afternoon to table a proposal for mandatory continuing legal education in Connecticut. The move essentially scuttles a Connecticut Bar Association-backed proposal until at least next year.
The proposal, which would have required lawyers to annually certify in writing that they had taken 36 hours of CLE in the past three years, had been endorsed by the CBA’s House of Delegates, but created deep divisions within the bar.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
