At the start of this year’s session of the Connecticut legislature, momentum for judicial reform was mounting. It seemed unthinkable that lawmakers would take no action in the wake of the controversy surrounding former Supreme Court Chief Justice William J. Sullivan. But despite seemingly ideal conditions, the unthinkable has become reality.
So what happened during the five-month session that stopped lawmakers from mandating more legislative oversight of the court system? What blunted the charge of crusaders such as Rep. Michael P. Lawlor, D-East Haven, and Sen. Andrew J. McDonald, D-Stamford?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
