Chalk up another win for arbitration in Connecticut. Through its recent decision of LaSalla v. Doctor’s Associates Inc., the Connecticut Supreme Court continues its march to the front of the judicial pack in support of the finality and flexibility of the arbitration process.
The holding is straightforward: that an arbitration panel is not required to adhere to the doctrine of claim preclusion when interpreting the same provision of a contract between the parties which was the subject of a prior arbitration between those parties.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
