In May, Gov. M. Jodi Rell suggested Connecticut might want to revisit the idea of having cameras in some of its courtrooms. The two commissions exploring public access to the court system are already doing just that.
For the decorous Supreme and Appellate courts, with no jurors or witnesses to worry about, the camera controversy is minimal. But at the Superior Court level, there is a sharp division of views, even among the Connecticut trial lawyers who could well be stars in televised trials.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
