Acting promptly, the state Appellate Court has vacated an order by a Bridgeport trial judge to shield, through the use of pseudonyms, a couple accused of malicious prosecution stemming from their child’s sexual assault charges.

Stamford lawyer Andrew Mitchell LaBella and his wife, Cheryl L. Hoppenstein, also an attorney, won the right to proceed as “John Doe” and “Jane Roe” after an April 24 hearing before Bridgeport Superior Court Judge Arthur Hiller. An appeals court panel, in a June 5 opinion, unanimously vacated Hiller’s anonymity order on grounds that he improperly placed the burden of persuasion on the plaintiff opposing anonymity.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]