I do not expect this column to compete toe-to-toe with Sudoku, but here’s a promise: if you get all the way to the end, you will be l00 percent up to date on the significant Connecticut appellate rulings on arbitration for the past two years.
The clearest, repeated message in the recent Supreme Court holdings is that Connecticut courts will, in all but the most rare and egregious circumstances, keep hands off arbitration awards: “Because we favor arbitration as a means of settling private disputes, we undertake judicial review of arbitration awards in a manner designed to minimize interference with an efficient and economical system of alternate dispute resolution.” State v. New England Health Care Employees Union; Nussbaum v. Kimberly Timbers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
