The first argument heard by the U.S. Supreme Court this term, Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, will determine whether our federal courts can continue to adjudicate human-rights cases, and whether corporations (as well as natural persons) can be named as defendants in those suits. These issues are critically important in and of themselves. But the Kiobel decision is also important because it will reveal whether the Roberts Court is principled, or so pro-big business that it is willing to ignore its own precedent.
Kiobel concerns the Alien Tort Statute of 1789, which grants jurisdiction to federal courts to hear claims (brought by aliens) arising from violations of treaties or the “law of nations.” The law of nations comprises fundamental legal principles so basic that they need no codification. In 1789, those norms included prohibitions against piracy and assaults against ambassadors.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
