If anyone thought former Supreme Court Justice C. Ian McLachlan was going to slip quietly into obscurity after he stepped down from the high court last summer, they’re mistaken.
Last week, he was heading a band of four prominent family law practitioners who are taking on Connecticut’s 40-year-old alimony statute. And they’re getting some unexpected backlash. The most controversial item is a mathematical formula for calculating spousal alimony.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
