The choice of an out-of-state law firm to represent the University of Connecticut in a high-profile civil matter is not sitting well with everyone.
None of the firms that submitted bids to represent UConn would complain for the record about the choice of a Philadelphia firm to conduct an investigation into how the university handled accusations of sexual misconduct against a professor. But in background conversations with the Law Tribune, some attorneys said the work should have stayed in state.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
