The 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. Miranda established a person’s right to be silent when questioned by police, and to have an attorney present. But the issue isn’t always clear cut and every so often Connecticut appellate courts field legal challenges claiming Miranda violations.
Most often, the decision turns on whether the person being questioned by police believed they were in the custody of police, or not, when they made incriminating statements.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
